Bringing responsibility for small area variations in hospitalization rates back to the hospital: the propensity to hospitalize index and a test of the Roemer's Law.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assign responsibility for variations in small area hospitalization rates to specific hospitals and to evaluate the Roemer's Law in a way that does not artificially induce correlation between bed supply and utilization. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: We used data on hospitalizations and outpatient treatment for 15 medical conditions of nonmanaged care Part B eligible Medicare enrollees of 65 years and older in Massachusetts in 2000. STUDY DESIGN: We used a Bayesian model to estimate each hospital's pool of potential patients and the fraction of the pool hospitalized (its propensity to hospitalize, PTH). To evaluate the Roemer's Law, we calculated the correlation between hospitals' PTH and beds per potential patient. Patient severity was measured using All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups. RESULTS: We show that our approach does not artificially induce a correlation between beds and utilization whereas the traditional approach does. Nevertheless, our approach indicates a strong relationship between PTH and beds (r=0.56). Eighteen (of 66) hospitals had a high PTH that differed significantly from 16 hospitals with a low PTH. Average patient severity in the high PTH hospitals was lower than in the low PTH hospitals. Although the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.12), there was a medium effect size (0.58). DISCUSSION: Variation across hospitals in the PTH index, the strong relationship between beds and the PTH, and the lack of relationship between severity and the PTH suggest the importance of policies that limit bed growth of high PTH hospitals and create incentives for high PTH hospitals to reduce hospitalizations.