Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A randomized phase II study comparing capecitabine alone with capecitabine and oral cyclophosphamide in patients with advanced breast cancer-cyclox II.
Harvey, V J; Sharples, K J; Isaacs, R J; Jameson, M B; Jeffery, G M; McLaren, B R; Pollard, S; Riley, G A; Simpson, A B; Hinder, V A; Scott, J N; Dzhelali, M V; Findlay, M P.
Afiliación
  • Harvey VJ; Regional Cancer and Blood Centre, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland. Electronic address: vernonh@adhb.govt.nz.
  • Sharples KJ; Cancer Trials New Zealand, Division of Oncology, University of Auckland, Auckland; Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin.
  • Isaacs RJ; Midcentral Regional Cancer Treatment Service, Palmerston North Hospital, Palmerston North.
  • Jameson MB; Waikato Regional Cancer Centre, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton.
  • Jeffery GM; Oncology Service, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch.
  • McLaren BR; Southern Blood and Cancer Service, Dunedin Hospital, Dunedin.
  • Pollard S; Cancer Trials New Zealand, Division of Oncology, University of Auckland, Auckland.
  • Riley GA; Cancer Trials New Zealand, Division of Oncology, University of Auckland, Auckland.
  • Simpson AB; Wellington Blood and Cancer Centre, Wellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Hinder VA; Cancer Trials New Zealand, Division of Oncology, University of Auckland, Auckland.
  • Scott JN; Cancer Trials New Zealand, Division of Oncology, University of Auckland, Auckland.
  • Dzhelali MV; Wellington Blood and Cancer Centre, Wellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Findlay MP; Cancer Trials New Zealand, Division of Oncology, University of Auckland, Auckland.
Ann Oncol ; 24(7): 1828-1834, 2013 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23463624
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Capecitabine and cyclophosphamide are active in patients with advanced breast cancer, have non-overlapping toxic effects and synergy pre-clinically. We explored the efficacy and toxic effect of an all-oral combination of capecitabine with cyclophosphamide versus capecitabine alone in a multicentre, randomized, phase II study. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer were randomized to treatment with capecitabine given continuously (666 mg/m(2) b.i.d. days 1-28) alone (C) or with oral cyclophosphamide (100 mg/m(2) days 1-14 of a 28-day cycle) (CCy) for up to six cycles.

RESULTS:

Eighty-two patients were randomized. There was no complete response. The proportions with partial response were 36% on C and 44% on CCy, a difference of 7.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) -13.4 to 29.1]. Significant toxic effect was uncommon grade ≥3 diarrhoea in 4 (10%) versus 1 (3%) patients; grade ≥3 fatigue in 2 (5%) versus 5 patients (13%) and grade ≥2 hand-foot syndrome in 7 (17%) versus 11 (28%) patients receiving C versus CCy, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 3.1 months on C and 6.9 months on CCy, not significantly different statistically. There was no difference in overall survival.

CONCLUSION:

The difference in tumour response suggests a reasonable chance that CCy is superior to C alone.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2013 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2013 Tipo del documento: Article