Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A serum-free, purified vero cell rabies vaccine is safe and as immunogenic as the reference vaccine Verorab for pre-exposure use in healthy adults: results from a randomized controlled phase-II trial.
Pichon, Sylvie; Guinet-Morlot, Françoise; Minutello, Maria; Donazzolo, Yves; Rouzier, Regine; Chassard, Didier; Fitoussi, Serge; Hou, Victor.
Afiliación
  • Pichon S; Sanofi Pasteur, 1541 Avenue Marcel Mérieux, 69280 Marcy-l'Étoile, France. Sylvie.Pichon@sanofipasteur.com
Vaccine ; 31(18): 2295-301, 2013 Apr 26.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23510665
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Verorab was licensed in 1985 for both pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis of rabies. The next generation purified Vero cell rabies vaccine (PVRV-NG) is a highly purified vaccine. We performed a phase II clinical study in adults in France to assess its immunological non-inferiority and clinical safety for pre-exposure prophylaxis.

METHODS:

In a randomized phase-II trial, 384 healthy adult subjects were randomized (21) to receive a three-dose primary series of PVRV-NG or Verorab. One year later, the PVRV-NG group received a PVRV-NG booster while the Verorab group participants were randomized to receive a booster of PVRV-NG or Verorab for. Rabies virus neutralizing antibodies (RVNA) were evaluated on days 0, 28 (subgroup), 42, months 6, 12 and 12+14 days. Safety was evaluated for seven days after each dose. Adverse event between doses, until 28 days after the final dose was recorded. Serious adverse events were recorded up to 6 months after the last dose.

RESULTS:

The criterion for non-inferiority was met in the per-protocol analysis set and confirmed in the full analysis set (FAS). In the FAS, 99.6% and 100% of subjects had RVNA titers ≥0.5 IU/mL in PVRV-NG and Verorab groups, respectively. While RVNA levels gradually decreased over the 12-month period, at 6 and 12 months after vaccination >89% and >77%, respectively, in both groups had RVNA titers ≥0.5 IU/mL. The PVRV-NG booster induced a strong response, irrespective of the vaccine given for the primary series. PVRV-NG was safe and well tolerated and its safety profile was similar to Verorab for unsolicited adverse events and solicited systemic reactions. The incidence of solicited injection-site reactions was lower with PVRV-NG than with Verorab after the primary series and the booster dose.

CONCLUSIONS:

PVRV-NG was shown to be at least as immunogenic as Verorab and to present a similar safety profile.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Rabia / Vacunas Antirrábicas Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Animals / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Vaccine Año: 2013 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Rabia / Vacunas Antirrábicas Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Animals / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Vaccine Año: 2013 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia