Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Journal club: How radiation exposure histories influence physician imaging decisions: a multicenter radiologist survey study.
Pandharipande, Pari V; Eisenberg, Jonathan D; Avery, Laura L; Gunn, Martin L; Kang, Stella K; Megibow, Alec J; Turan, Ekin A; Harvey, H Benjamin; Kong, Chung Yin; Dowling, Emily C; Halpern, Elkan F; Donelan, Karen; Gazelle, G Scott.
Afiliación
  • Pandharipande PV; Institute for Technology Assessment, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 101 Merrimac St, 10th Fl, Boston, MA 02114, USA. pari@mgh-ita.org
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 200(6): 1275-83, 2013 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23701064
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this article is to evaluate the influence of patient radiation exposure histories on radiologists' imaging decisions. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We conducted a physician survey study in three academic medical centers. Radiologists were asked to make an imaging recommendation for a hypothetical patient with a history of multiple CT scans. We queried radiologists' decision making, evaluating whether they incorporated cancer risks from previous imaging, reported acceptance (or rejection) of the linear no-threshold model, and understood linear no-threshold model implications in this setting. Consistency between radiologists' decisions and their linear no-threshold model beliefs was evaluated; those acting in accordance with the linear no-threshold model were expected to disregard previously incurred cancer risks. A Fisher exact test was used to verify the generalizability of results across institutions and training levels (residents, fellows, and attending physicians).

RESULTS:

Fifty-six percent (322/578) of radiologists completed the survey. Most (92% [295/322]) incorporated risks from the patient's exposure history during decision making. Most (61% [196/322]) also reported acceptance of the linear no-threshold model. Fewer (25% [79/322]) rejected the linear no-threshold model; 15% (47/322) could not judge. Among radiologists reporting linear no-threshold model acceptance or rejection, the minority (36% [98/275]) made decisions that were consistent with their linear no-threshold model beliefs. This finding was not statistically different across institutions (p = 0.070) or training levels (p = 0.183). Few radiologists (4% [13/322]) had an accurate understanding of linear no-threshold model implications.

CONCLUSION:

Most radiologists, when faced with patient exposure histories, make decisions that contradict their self-reported acceptance of the linear no-threshold model and the linear no-threshold model itself. These findings underscore a need for educational initiatives.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dosis de Radiación / Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina / Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X / Toma de Decisiones / Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: AJR Am J Roentgenol Año: 2013 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dosis de Radiación / Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina / Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X / Toma de Decisiones / Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: AJR Am J Roentgenol Año: 2013 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos