Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sensitivity and specificity of bedside ultrasonography in the diagnosis of fractures of the fifth metacarpal.
Aksay, Ersin; Yesilaras, Murat; Kilic, Turgay Yilmaz; Tur, Feriyde Caliskan; Sever, Mustafa; Kaya, Ahmet.
Afiliación
  • Aksay E; Department of Emergency Medicine, Izmir Tepecik Research and Educational Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Yesilaras M; Department of Emergency Medicine, Izmir Tepecik Research and Educational Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Kilic TY; Department of Emergency Medicine, Izmir Tepecik Research and Educational Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Tur FC; Department of Emergency Medicine, Izmir Tepecik Research and Educational Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Sever M; Department of Emergency Medicine, Izmir Tepecik Research and Educational Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Kaya A; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Izmir Tepecik Research and Educational Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Emerg Med J ; 32(3): 221-5, 2015 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24154940
OBJECTIVES: Ultrasonography is becoming increasingly common in the diagnosis of fracture in emergency medicine. The aim of our study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of sonographic examinations for diagnosing fifth metacarpal fractures. METHODS: A prospective study was performed of consecutive patients aged >14 years admitted to the emergency department with hand trauma and tenderness over the fifth metacarpal. Anteroposterior and oblique plain x-rays were taken on all patients. Emergency physicians performed bedside sonographic examination. The x-rays were reported by an orthopaedic surgeon who was blinded to the sonographic examination findings. The orthopaedic surgeon's report was considered the gold standard unless a CT scan was performed. In the single case where this occurred, the CT scan report was considered the gold standard. RESULTS: Eighty one patients were included in the study, 39 of whom had fractures. Sonographic examination identified the fractures in 38 patients. One occult fracture undetected by plain radiography, later shown on CT scan, was identified by sonographic examination. There were three cases with false positive ultrasound findings. The sensitivity of the diagnosis of fifth metacarpal fractures by ultrasonography was 97.4% (95% CI 84.9% to 99.9%), specificity was 92.9% (95% CI 79.4% to 98.1%), positive likelihood ratio (LR) was 14 (95% CI 4.58 to 41), negative LR was 0.03 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.19), negative predictive value was 97.5% (95% CI 85.3% to 99.9%) and positive predictive value was 92.6% (95% CI 79% to 98.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Sonographic examination can be used as an effective diagnostic tool in patients with fifth metacarpal trauma.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sistemas de Atención de Punto / Huesos del Metacarpo / Fracturas Óseas / Traumatismos de la Mano Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Emerg Med J Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sistemas de Atención de Punto / Huesos del Metacarpo / Fracturas Óseas / Traumatismos de la Mano Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Emerg Med J Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía