Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of magnetic resonance feature tracking for systolic and diastolic strain and strain rate calculation with spatial modulation of magnetization imaging analysis.
Moody, William E; Taylor, Robin J; Edwards, Nicola C; Chue, Colin D; Umar, Fraz; Taylor, Tiffany J; Ferro, Charles J; Young, Alistair A; Townend, Jonathan N; Leyva, F; Steeds, Richard P.
Afiliación
  • Moody WE; Department of Cardiology, Nuffield House, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK; Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
J Magn Reson Imaging ; 41(4): 1000-12, 2015 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24677420
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To compare cardiovascular magnetic resonance-feature tracking (CMR-FT) with spatial modulation of magnetization (SPAMM) tagged imaging for the calculation of short and long axis Lagrangian strain measures in systole and diastole. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Healthy controls (n = 35) and patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 10) were identified prospectively and underwent steady-state free precession (SSFP) cine imaging and SPAMM imaging using a gradient-echo sequence. A timed offline analysis of images acquired at identical horizontal long and short axis slice positions was performed using CMR-FT and dynamic tissue-tagging (CIMTag2D). Agreement between strain and strain rate (SR) values calculated using these two different methods was assessed using the Bland-Altman technique.

RESULTS:

Across all participants, there was good agreement between CMR-FT and CIMTag for calculation of peak systolic global circumferential strain (-22.7 ± 6.2% vs. -22.5 ± 6.9%, bias 0.2 ± 4.0%) and SR (-1.35 ± 0.42 1/s vs. -1.22 ± 0.42 1/s, bias 0.13 ± 0.33 1/s) and early diastolic global circumferential SR (1.21 ± 0.44 1/s vs. 1.07 ± 0.30 1/s, bias -0.14 ± 0.34 1/s) at the subendocardium. There was satisfactory agreement for derivation of peak systolic global longitudinal strain (-18.1 ± 5.0% vs. -16.7 ± 4.8%, bias 1.3 ± 3.8%) and SR (-1.04 ± 0.29 1/s vs. -0.95 ± 0.32 1/s, bias 0.09 ± 0.26 1/s). The weakest agreement was for early diastolic global longitudinal SR (1.10 ± 0.40 1/s vs. 0.67 ± 0.32 1/s, bias -0.42 ± 0.40 1/s), although the correlation remained significant (r = 0.42, P < 0.01). CMR-FT generated these data over four times quicker than CIMTag.

CONCLUSION:

There is sufficient agreement between systolic and diastolic strain measures calculated using CMR-FT and myocardial tagging for CMR-FT to be considered as a potentially feasible and rapid alternative.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador / Cardiomiopatía Dilatada / Disfunción Ventricular / Imagen por Resonancia Cinemagnética / Diagnóstico por Imagen de Elasticidad / Ventrículos Cardíacos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Magn Reson Imaging Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador / Cardiomiopatía Dilatada / Disfunción Ventricular / Imagen por Resonancia Cinemagnética / Diagnóstico por Imagen de Elasticidad / Ventrículos Cardíacos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Magn Reson Imaging Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido