Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of paracetamol for acute low-back pain: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial.
Williams, Christopher M; Maher, Christopher G; Latimer, Jane; McLachlan, Andrew J; Hancock, Mark J; Day, Richard O; Lin, Chung-Wei Christine.
Afiliación
  • Williams CM; The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Hunter Medical Research Institute and School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: cwilliams@georgeinstitute.org.au.
  • Maher CG; The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
  • Latimer J; The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
  • McLachlan AJ; Faculty of Pharmacy and Centre for Education and Research in Ageing, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Hancock MJ; Faculty of Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Day RO; Clinical Pharmacology, University of New South Wales and St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
  • Lin CW; The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Lancet ; 384(9954): 1586-96, 2014 Nov 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25064594
BACKGROUND: Regular paracetamol is the recommended first-line analgesic for acute low-back pain; however, no high-quality evidence supports this recommendation. We aimed to assess the efficacy of paracetamol taken regularly or as-needed to improve time to recovery from pain, compared with placebo, in patients with low-back pain. METHODS: We did a multicentre, double-dummy, randomised, placebo controlled trial across 235 primary care centres in Sydney, Australia, from Nov 11, 2009, to March 5, 2013. We randomly allocated patients with acute low-back pain in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive up to 4 weeks of regular doses of paracetamol (three times per day; equivalent to 3990 mg paracetamol per day), as-needed doses of paracetamol (taken when needed for pain relief; maximum 4000 mg paracetamol per day), or placebo. Randomisation was done according to a centralised randomisation schedule prepared by a researcher who was not involved in patient recruitment or data collection. Patients and staff at all sites were masked to treatment allocation. All participants received best-evidence advice and were followed up for 3 months. The primary outcome was time until recovery from low-back pain, with recovery defined as a pain score of 0 or 1 (on a 0-10 pain scale) sustained for 7 consecutive days. All data were analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, number ACTN 12609000966291. FINDINGS: 550 participants were assigned to the regular group (550 analysed), 549 were assigned to the as-needed group (546 analysed), and 553 were assigned to the placebo group (547 analysed). Median time to recovery was 17 days (95% CI 14-19) in the regular group, 17 days (15-20) in the as-needed group, and 16 days (14-20) in the placebo group (regular vs placebo hazard ratio 0·99, 95% CI 0·87-1·14; as-needed vs placebo 1·05, 0·92-1·19; regular vs as-needed 1·05, 0·92-1·20). We recorded no difference between treatment groups for time to recovery (adjusted p=0·79). Adherence to regular tablets (median tablets consumed per participant per day of maximum 6; 4·0 [IQR 1·6-5·7] in the regular group, 3·9 [1·5-5·6] in the as-needed group, and 4·0 [1·5-5·7] in the placebo group), and number of participants reporting adverse events (99 [18·5%] in the regular group, 99 [18·7%] in the as-needed group, and 98 [18·5%] in the placebo group) were similar between groups. INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that regular or as-needed dosing with paracetamol does not affect recovery time compared with placebo in low-back pain, and question the universal endorsement of paracetamol in this patient group. FUNDING: National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and GlaxoSmithKline Australia.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dolor de la Región Lumbar / Analgésicos no Narcóticos / Dolor Agudo / Acetaminofén Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Lancet Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dolor de la Región Lumbar / Analgésicos no Narcóticos / Dolor Agudo / Acetaminofén Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Lancet Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article