Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does ultrasonic advanced energy reduce lymphocele incidence in laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy?
Lamblin, Gery; Chauvy, Lauriane; Rannou, Corinne; Mathevet, Patrice; Chabert, Philippe; Mellier, Georges; Chene, Gautier.
Afiliación
  • Lamblin G; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Femme Mère Enfant University Hospital, Lyon, France. Electronic address: gery.lamblin@chu-lyon.fr.
  • Chauvy L; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Femme Mère Enfant University Hospital, Lyon, France.
  • Rannou C; Department of Radiology, Femme Mère Enfant University Hospital, Lyon, France.
  • Mathevet P; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Femme Mère Enfant University Hospital, Lyon, France.
  • Chabert P; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Femme Mère Enfant University Hospital, Lyon, France.
  • Mellier G; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Femme Mère Enfant University Hospital, Lyon, France.
  • Chene G; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Femme Mère Enfant University Hospital, Lyon, France.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 185: 53-8, 2015 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25528730
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the use of ultrasonic advanced energy in reducing the occurrence of symptomatic lymphocele and its related complications in laparoscopic extra-peritoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with gynecological cancer. STUDY

DESIGN:

A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients in a tertiary referral center identified 2 groups of patients, undergoing laparoscopic extra-peritoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy with or without the use of ultrasonic advanced energy. Surgery time, hospital stay, number of retrieved nodes and lymphocele requiring treatment were studied. Results were also compared between trained and trainee surgeons.

RESULTS:

163 patients were scheduled for laparoscopic extra-peritoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy 81 treated using bipolar energy (control group group 1) between August 1999 and January 2005, and 82 treated using ultrasonic advanced energy (study group group 2) between July 2010 and March 2014. The main indication (90% in group 1, 61% in group 2) was advanced cervical carcinoma (stage IB2 and above). Ultrasonic advanced energy significantly decreased operative time (p=0.001) and intra-operative bleeding (p=0.01) and increased the number of para-aortic nodes retrieved (p=0.02). There was no significant difference in hospital stay or lymphocele requiring treatment (8.6% in group 1, 8.5% in group 2 p=0.98). For senior than for junior surgeons, surgery time was shorter but not significantly (p=0.80) and postoperative lymphocele rates were identical.

CONCLUSION:

Ultrasonic advanced energy may provide benefit in laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy, facilitating surgical ergonomics, but did not decrease post-surgery lymphocele.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Linfocele / Carcinoma / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ultrasónicos / Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos / Escisión del Ganglio Linfático Tipo de estudio: Incidence_studies / Observational_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Linfocele / Carcinoma / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ultrasónicos / Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos / Escisión del Ganglio Linfático Tipo de estudio: Incidence_studies / Observational_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article