Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Proximal caries lesion detection using the Canary Caries Detection System: an in vitro study.
Jan, Janja; Wan Bakar, Wan Zaripah; Mathews, Sapna M; Okoye, Linda O; Ehler, Benjamin R; Louden, Christopher; Amaechi, Bennett T.
Afiliación
  • Jan J; Department of Cariology and Endodontics, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia. janja.jan@mf.uni-lj.si.
  • Wan Bakar WZ; School of Dental Sciences, University Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, Malaysia.
  • Mathews SM; Department of Comprehensive Dentistry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
  • Okoye LO; Faculty of Dentistry, University of Nigeria, Enugu, Nigeria.
  • Ehler BR; Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
  • Louden C; Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
  • Amaechi BT; Department of Comprehensive Dentistry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
J Investig Clin Dent ; 7(4): 383-390, 2016 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26012784
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This study investigated the accuracy of the Canary System (CS) to detect proximal caries lesions in vitro, and compared it with conventional

methods:

International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) II and bitewing radiography (BW).

METHODS:

Visible proximal surfaces of extracted human teeth were assessed by ICDAS-II before setting them in five manikin mouth models. Then contacting proximal surfaces in mouth models were assessed by BW and CS. Histological validation with polarized-light microscopy served as a gold standard. Pairwise comparisons were performed on area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of the three methods, and corrected using Bonferroni's method. Sensitivities and specificities were compared using a test of proportions and AUC values were compared using DeLong's method.

RESULTS:

The CS presented significantly higher sensitivity (0.933) than ICDAS-II (0.733, P = 0.01) and BW (0.267, P < 0.001), and ICDAS-II higher sensitivity than BW (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between their specificity values 0.825 (CS), 0.65 (ICDAS-II), and 0.875 (BW). The AUC of CS (0.862) was significantly higher than of ICDAS-II (0.681, P < 0.001) and BW (0.577, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

The CS demonstrated greater accuracy in detecting proximal lesions than ICDAS-II and BW, although without significantly higher specificity.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Caries Dental / Pruebas de Actividad de Caries Dental Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Investig Clin Dent Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Eslovenia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Caries Dental / Pruebas de Actividad de Caries Dental Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Investig Clin Dent Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Eslovenia