Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy/safety of ranibizumab monotherapy or with laser versus laser monotherapy in DME.
Berger, Alan; Sheidow, Tom; Cruess, Alan F; Arbour, Jean Daniel; Courseau, Anne-Sophie; de Takacsy, Frederica.
Afiliación
  • Berger A; St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto.
  • Sheidow T; Ivey Eye Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital, London, Ont. Electronic address: Sheidowt@me.com.
  • Cruess AF; Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S.
  • Arbour JD; CHUM, Notre-Dame Hospital & University of Montreal, Montreal.
  • Courseau AS; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Dorval, Que.
  • de Takacsy F; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Dorval, Que.
Can J Ophthalmol ; 50(3): 209-16, 2015 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26040221
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injection, as monotherapy or in combination with laser, with laser monotherapy in patients with visual impairment caused by diabetic macular edema.

DESIGN:

Twelve-month, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomized, active-control study.

PARTICIPANTS:

A total of 220 (ranibizumab monotherapy n = 75, ranibizumab + laser n = 73, laser monotherapy n = 72) patients with a diagnosis of type I or II diabetes and visual impairment caused by macular edema were included in the efficacy analysis.

METHODS:

Ranibizumab was initiated with a fixed loading phase of 3 monthly injections followed by as needed therapy until stable vision achievement. Efficacy end points were the change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), change in central retinal thickness (CRT) measured by optical coherence tomography, proportion achieving a 15-letter BCVA gain, and 12-month Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25) score. Safety was assessed with the incidence and severity of adverse events.

RESULTS:

At 12 months, significant (p < 0.001) mean BCVA improvements were observed for both the ranibizumab monotherapy (+8.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.0-10.7] letters) and the ranibizumab + laser (+8.2 [95% CI 6.0-10.4] letters) groups compared with the laser monotherapy group (+0.3 [95% CI -2.9 to 3.5] letters). Similarly, a better response in terms of CRT improvement, BCVA letter gain, and VFQ-25 was observed in both ranibizumab groups compared with laser monotherapy. The safety profile was comparable in the 2 ranibizumab groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Ranibizumab as monotherapy or combined with laser resulted in significantly higher improvements in visual acuity and vision-related quality of life at month 12 as compared with laser monotherapy.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Edema Macular / Coagulación con Láser / Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis / Retinopatía Diabética / Ranibizumab Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Can J Ophthalmol Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Edema Macular / Coagulación con Láser / Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis / Retinopatía Diabética / Ranibizumab Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Can J Ophthalmol Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article