Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Experiences From 1208 Cases of Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Experiences From 1208 Cases of Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy.
Kim, Ji Hoon; Kim, Ho Young; Park, Sung Kyun; Lee, Jung Sun; Heo, Dong Sik; Park, Sang Wook; Lee, Yoon Suk.
Afiliación
  • Kim JH; Department of Surgery, Incheon St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Ann Surg ; 262(6): 1054-8, 2015 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26559780
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Currently single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SIL-A) has become an option for treating appendicitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of SIL-A compared with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CL-A) on a large experimental cohort.

BACKGROUND:

Several studies had reported the safety and technical feasibility of SIL-A, albeit with a limited number of study subjects.

METHODS:

A total of 2587 patients (1208 SIL-A and 1379 CL-A) who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy from May 2008 to April 2013 were studied retrospectively. The clinical characteristics and short-term operative outcomes of these patients were reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS:

There were more simple type appendicitis in the SIL-A group and more complicated type appendicitis in CL-A group (81.0% vs 74.7% and 19% vs 25.3%, P <0.001, respectively). The operative time (minutes) was similar between the 2 groups (40.1 ±â€Š18.6 vs 38.8 ±â€Š25.2, P = 0.154). However, on subgroup analysis, operative time for simple type appendicitis was longer in the SIL-A group (36.6 ±â€Š14.9 vs 32.3 ±â€Š18.3, P < 0.001). The superficial incisional surgical site infection rate was higher in the SIL-A group (4.4% vs 2.3%, P = 0.003). The readmission rate was higher in the CL-A group (0.8% vs 1.7%, P = 0.042). The postoperative hospital stay (days) was shorter in the SIL-A group (3.05 ±â€Š1.97 vs 3.35 ±â€Š2.14, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

In this study, SIL-A was technically feasible and safe option for appendicitis. The SIL-A group had more favorable outcomes such as shorter time to start diet and less hospital stay after surgery than the CL-A group. However, superficial incisional surgical site infection rate was higher in the SIL-A group than in the CL-A group, an effort to reduce superficial incisional SSI should be made.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Apendicectomía / Apendicitis / Laparoscopía Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Apendicectomía / Apendicitis / Laparoscopía Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article