Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
HYC-24L Demonstrates Greater Effectiveness With Less Pain Than CPM-22.5 for Treatment of Perioral Lines in a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Butterwick, Kimberly; Marmur, Ellen; Narurkar, Vic; Cox, Sue Ellen; Joseph, John H; Sadick, Neil S; Tedaldi, Ruth; Wheeler, Sarah; Kolodziejczyk, Julia K; Gallagher, Conor J.
Afiliación
  • Butterwick K; *Private Practice, San Diego, California; †Marmur Medical, New York, New York; ‡Bay Area Laser Institute, San Francisco, California; §Aesthetic Solutions, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; ‖Private Practice, Beverly Hills, California; ¶Sadick Dermatology, New York, New York; #Dermatology Partners, Inc., Wellesley, Massachusetts; **Allergan plc, Irvine, California.
Dermatol Surg ; 41(12): 1351-60, 2015 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26606435
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This trial compares the effectiveness and safety of HYC-24L (Juvéderm Ultra XC; Allergan plc, Dublin, Ireland) (24 mg/mL of hyaluronic acid, 0.3% lidocaine) and CPM-22.5 (Belotero Balance; Merz Aesthetics, Raleigh, NC) (22.5 mg/mL of hyaluronic acid) for the treatment of perioral lines. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Men and women aged 35 years or older with moderate-to-severe perioral lines were recruited for this randomized controlled, rater-blinded, 2-arm trial. The primary endpoint was a comparison of rater-assessed responder rates by the validated 4-point Perioral Lines Severity Scale at Month 6; responders were those who showed a ≥1 point improvement. A secondary endpoint was subject-assessed change in perioral lines measured by the Global Assessment of Change Scale.

RESULTS:

A total of 136 subjects received treatment and 132 completed the trial (mean age 58 ± 8 years). Total volume injected was 1.18 mL (HYC-24L) and 1.32 mL (CPM-22.5). At Month 6, a significantly greater proportion of HYC-24L subjects responded to treatment (87%) than CPM-22.5 subjects (72%) (p < .04). At all time points, HYC-24L subjects reported significantly greater improvement in their perioral lines than CPM-22.5 subjects, with the greatest difference at Month 6. No unexpected adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSION:

HYC-24L subjects showed a higher response rate and a greater improvement in their perioral lines than CPM-22.5 subjects for up to 6 months.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Envejecimiento de la Piel / Técnicas Cosméticas / Rellenos Dérmicos / Ácido Hialurónico Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Dermatol Surg Asunto de la revista: DERMATOLOGIA Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Envejecimiento de la Piel / Técnicas Cosméticas / Rellenos Dérmicos / Ácido Hialurónico Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Dermatol Surg Asunto de la revista: DERMATOLOGIA Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article