Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
ALternate Site Cardiac ResYNChronization (ALSYNC): a prospective and multicentre study of left ventricular endocardial pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Morgan, John M; Biffi, Mauro; Gellér, László; Leclercq, Christophe; Ruffa, Franco; Tung, Stanley; Defaye, Pascal; Yang, Zhongping; Gerritse, Bart; van Ginneken, Mireille; Yee, Raymond; Jais, Pierre.
Afiliación
  • Morgan JM; Cardiac Rhythm Management, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK jmm@hrclinic.org.
  • Biffi M; S Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
  • Gellér L; Semmelweis University Heart Center, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Leclercq C; University Hospital, Rennes, France.
  • Ruffa F; Alessandro Manzoni Hospital, Lecco, Italy.
  • Tung S; St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Defaye P; University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
  • Yang Z; Medtronic Plc, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  • Gerritse B; Medtronic Bakken Research Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • van Ginneken M; Medtronic Bakken Research Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Yee R; London Health Sciences Center, London, ON, Canada.
  • Jais P; CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux University, Bordeaux, France.
Eur Heart J ; 37(27): 2118-27, 2016 Jul 14.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26787437
AIMS: The ALternate Site Cardiac ResYNChronization (ALSYNC) study evaluated the feasibility and safety of left ventricular endocardial pacing (LVEP) using a market-released pacing lead implanted via a single pectoral access by a novel atrial transseptal lead delivery system. METHODS AND RESULTS: ALSYNC was a prospective clinical investigation with a minimum of 12-month follow-up in 18 centres of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)-indicated patients, who had failed or were unsuitable for conventional CRT. The ALSYNC system comprises the investigational lead delivery system and LVEP lead. Patients required warfarin therapy post-implant. The primary study objective was safety at 6-month follow-up, which was defined as freedom from complications related to the lead delivery system, implant procedure, or the lead ≥70%. The ALSYNC study enrolled 138 patients. The LVEP lead implant success rate was 89.4%. Freedom from complications meeting the definition of primary endpoint was 82.2% at 6 months (95% CI 75.6-88.8%). In the study, 14 transient ischaemic attacks (9 patients, 6.8%), 5 non-disabling strokes (5 patients, 3.8%), and 23 deaths (17.4%) were observed. No death was from a primary endpoint complication. At 6 months, the New York Heart Association class improved in 59% of patients, and 55% had LV end-systolic volume reduction of 15% or greater. Those patients enrolled after CRT non-response showed similar improvement with LVEP. CONCLUSIONS: The ALSYNC study demonstrates clinical feasibility, and provides an early indication of possible benefit and risk of LVEP. CLINICAL TRIAL: NCT01277783.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ventrículos Cardíacos Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Heart J Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ventrículos Cardíacos Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Heart J Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article