Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Tumour-free margins in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma: Does distance really matter?
Nooij, L S; van der Slot, M A; Dekkers, O M; Stijnen, T; Gaarenstroom, K N; Creutzberg, C L; Smit, V T H B M; Bosse, T; van Poelgeest, M I E.
Afiliación
  • Nooij LS; Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • van der Slot MA; Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Dekkers OM; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Stijnen T; Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Gaarenstroom KN; Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Creutzberg CL; Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Smit VT; Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Bosse T; Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • van Poelgeest MI; Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands. Electronic address: M.I.E.van_Poelgeest@lumc.nl.
Eur J Cancer ; 65: 139-49, 2016 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27497345
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

There is no consensus on the width of tumour-free margins after surgery for vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC). Most current guidelines recommend tumour-free margins of ≥8 mm. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a margin of <8 mm is associated with an increased risk of local recurrence in VSCC.

METHODS:

A meta-analysis of the available literature and a cohort study of 148 VSCC patients seen at a referral centre from 2000 to 2012 was performed. The primary end-point of the cohort study was a histologically confirmed ipsilateral local recurrence within 2 years after primary treatment in relation to the margin distance.

RESULTS:

Based on 10 studies, the meta-analysis showed that a tumour-free margin of <8 mm is associated with a higher risk of local recurrence compared to a tumour-free margin of ≥8 mm (pooled risk ratio, 1.99 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.13-3.51], p = 0.02). In the cohort study, we found no clear difference in the risk of local recurrence in the <8 versus ≥8 mm group; however, 40% of the patients in the <8 mm group received additional treatment. Tumour-positive margin was the only independent risk factor for local recurrence in the multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 0.21 [95% CI 0.08-0.55]).

CONCLUSIONS:

This work provides important data to question the commonly used 8-mm margin as a prognosticator for local recurrence. More research is needed to address the question of whether additional treatment improves the prognosis in patients with a tumour-free margin of <8 mm.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Vulva / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas / Márgenes de Escisión Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Cancer Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Vulva / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas / Márgenes de Escisión Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Cancer Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos