Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Process Improvement in Thoracic Donor Organ Procurement: Implementation of a Donor Assessment Checklist.
Loor, Gabriel; Shumway, Sara J; McCurry, Kenneth R; Keshavamurthy, Suresh; Hussain, Syed; Weide, Garry D; Spratt, John R; Al Salihi, Mazin; Koch, Colleen G.
Afiliación
  • Loor G; Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Electronic address: gloor@umn.edu.
  • Shumway SJ; Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • McCurry KR; Heart and Vascular Institute, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Keshavamurthy S; Heart and Vascular Institute, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Hussain S; Heart and Vascular Institute, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Weide GD; Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Spratt JR; Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Al Salihi M; Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Koch CG; Heart and Vascular Institute, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 102(6): 1872-1877, 2016 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27659600
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Donor organs are often procured by junior staff in stressful, unfamiliar environments where a single adverse event can be catastrophic. A formalized checklist focused on preprocedural processes related to thoracic donor organ procurement could improve detection and prevention of near miss events.

METHODS:

A checklist was developed centered on patient identifiers, organ compatibility and quality, and team readiness. It went through five cycles of feedback and revision using a panel of expert procurement surgeons. Educational in-service sessions were held on the use of the checklist as well as best organ assessment practices. Near miss events before the survey were tallied by retrospective review of 20 procurements, and near misses after checklist implementation were prospectively recorded. We implemented the checklist for 40 donor lung and heart procurements 20 from Cleveland Clinic and 20 from the University of Minnesota. A final survey assessment was used to determine ease of use.

RESULTS:

Nine near miss events were reported in 20 procurements before use of the checklist. Thirty-one near miss events of 40 organ procurements were identified and potentially prevented by the checklist. Eighty-seven percent of fellows found the checklist to be unobtrusive to work flow, and 100% believed its use should be mandatory. Mortality was the same before and after implementation of the checklist despite increased patient volumes.

CONCLUSIONS:

Implementation of a simple checklist for use during thoracic organ procurement uncovered a substantial number of near miss events. A preprocedural checklist for all thoracic organ transplants in the United States and abroad is feasible and would likely reduce adverse events.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos / Trasplante de Corazón / Trasplante de Pulmón / Selección de Donante / Lista de Verificación Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Ann Thorac Surg Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos / Trasplante de Corazón / Trasplante de Pulmón / Selección de Donante / Lista de Verificación Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Ann Thorac Surg Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article