Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
ACR appropriateness criteria® nasal cavity and paranasal sinus cancers.
Siddiqui, Farzan; Smith, Richard V; Yom, Sue S; Beitler, Jonathan J; Busse, Paul M; Cooper, Jay S; Hanna, Ehab Y; Jones, Christopher U; Koyfman, Shlomo A; Quon, Harry; Ridge, John A; Saba, Nabil F; Worden, Francis; Yao, Min; Salama, Joseph K.
Afiliación
  • Siddiqui F; Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.
  • Smith RV; Montefiore Medical Center, American College of Surgeons, Bronx, New York.
  • Yom SS; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Beitler JJ; Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Busse PM; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Cooper JS; Maimonides Cancer Center, Brooklyn, New York.
  • Hanna EY; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Jones CU; Radiological Associates of Sacramento, Sacramento, California.
  • Koyfman SA; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Quon H; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Ridge JA; Fox Chase Cancer Center, American College of Surgeons, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Saba NF; Emory University, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Worden F; University of Michigan, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Yao M; University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Salama JK; Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Head Neck ; 39(3): 407-418, 2017 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28032679
The American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. Here, we present the Appropriateness Criteria for cancers arising in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses (maxillary, sphenoid, and ethmoid sinuses). This includes clinical presentation, prognostic factors, principles of management, and treatment outcomes. Controversies regarding management of cervical lymph nodes are discussed. Rare and unusual nasal cavity cancers, such as esthesioneuroblastoma and sinonasal undifferentiated carcinomas, are included. © 2016 American College of Radiology. Head Neck, 2016 © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 39: 407-418, 2017.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de los Senos Paranasales / Neoplasias Nasales / Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto / Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante / Procedimientos Quírurgicos Nasales / Cavidad Nasal Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Head Neck Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de los Senos Paranasales / Neoplasias Nasales / Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto / Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante / Procedimientos Quírurgicos Nasales / Cavidad Nasal Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Head Neck Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article