Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
When does behavior follow intent? Relationships between trait level dietary restraint and daily eating behaviors.
Rodgers, Rachel F; Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Matthew; Holmes, Millicent; Skouteris, Helen; Broadbent, Jaclyn.
Afiliación
  • Rodgers RF; APPEAR, Department of Applied Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, USA. Electronic address: r.rodgers@northeastern.edu.
  • Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M; School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Holmes M; School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Skouteris H; School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Broadbent J; School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.
Appetite ; 120: 449-455, 2018 Jan 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28970185
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The relationship between self-report trait level restriction and daily engagement in restriction behaviors is not well understood, and as a result the usefulness of such trait level measures is unclear. The present study aimed both to examine the validity of self-reported trait dietary restraint behaviors, and to examine the respective relationships among self-reported trait dietary restraint intentions and behaviors and both restrained and disinhibited eating at the daily level.

METHODS:

A sample of 109 women (Mage = 24.72, SD = 4.15) completed a self-report trait level measure of dietary restraint before providing EMA data on their daily engagement in dietary restraint and disinhibited eating behaviors, as well as mood, over a period of 7 days. Multilevel hurdle models were used to test the relationship between trait levels of dietary restraint, and daily level reports of restraint and disinhibited eating behaviors.

RESULTS:

Trait restraint behavior was a consistent predictor of daily presence and frequency of restraint behaviors. In contrast, trait restraint intentions was not a predictor of daily restraint behaviors, however it did predict daily frequency of overeating. In addition, daily negative affect emerged as a predictor of comfort eating, but was not predictive of restraint behaviors.

CONCLUSIONS:

Findings confirm the usefulness of assessments of self-reported trait dietary restraint behaviors as a method of capturing dieting behaviors. In contrast, trait level dietary restraint intentions was a poor predictor of eating outcomes and more research on the way that restraint intentions affect eating behaviors is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud / Restricción Calórica / Intención / Dieta / Conducta Alimentaria Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Appetite Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud / Restricción Calórica / Intención / Dieta / Conducta Alimentaria Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Appetite Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article