Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Tonic aortic depressor nerve stimulation does not impede baroreflex dynamic characteristics concomitantly mediated by the stimulated nerve.
Kawada, Toru; Turner, Michael J; Shimizu, Shuji; Kamiya, Atsunori; Shishido, Toshiaki; Sugimachi, Masaru.
Afiliación
  • Kawada T; Department of Cardiovascular Dynamics, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.
  • Turner MJ; Department of Cardiovascular Dynamics, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.
  • Shimizu S; Department of Cardiovascular Dynamics, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.
  • Kamiya A; Department of Cardiovascular Dynamics, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.
  • Shishido T; Department of Research Promotion, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center , Osaka , Japan.
  • Sugimachi M; Department of Cardiovascular Dynamics, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol ; 314(3): R459-R467, 2018 03 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29118022
Although electrical activation of the carotid sinus baroreflex (baroreflex activation therapy) is being explored as a device therapy for resistant hypertension, possible effects on baroreflex dynamic characteristics of interaction between electrical stimulation and pressure inputs are not fully elucidated. To examine whether the electrical stimulation of the baroreceptor afferent nerve impedes normal short-term arterial pressure (AP) regulation mediated by the stimulated nerve, we electrically stimulated the right aortic depressor nerve (ADN) while estimating the baroreflex dynamic characteristics by imposing pressure inputs to the isolated baroreceptor region of the right ADN in nine anesthetized rats. A Gaussian white noise signal with a mean of 120 mmHg and standard deviation of 20 mmHg was used for the pressure perturbation. A tonic ADN stimulation (2 or 5 Hz, 10 V, 0.1-ms pulse width) decreased mean sympathetic nerve activity (367.0 ± 70.9 vs. 247.3 ± 47.2 arbitrary units, P < 0.01) and mean AP (98.4 ± 7.8 vs. 89.2 ± 4.5 mmHg, P < 0.01) during dynamic pressure perturbation. The ADN stimulation did not affect the slope of dynamic gain in the neural arc transfer function from pressure perturbation to sympathetic nerve activity (16.9 ± 1.0 vs. 14.7 ± 1.6 dB/decade, not significant). These results indicate that electrical stimulation of the baroreceptor afferent nerve does not significantly impede the dynamic characteristics of the arterial baroreflex concomitantly mediated by the stimulated nerve. Short-term AP regulation by the arterial baroreflex may be preserved during the baroreflex activation therapy.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aorta / Presorreceptores / Sistema Nervioso Simpático / Seno Carotídeo / Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica / Barorreflejo / Presión Arterial / Corazón Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Asunto de la revista: FISIOLOGIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aorta / Presorreceptores / Sistema Nervioso Simpático / Seno Carotídeo / Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica / Barorreflejo / Presión Arterial / Corazón Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Asunto de la revista: FISIOLOGIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón