Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
For the Good of the Group? Balancing Individual and Collective Risks and Benefits in Community Psychology Research.
Dworkin, Emily R; Allen, Nicole E.
Afiliación
  • Dworkin ER; Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Allen NE; Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.
Am J Community Psychol ; 60(3-4): 391-397, 2017 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29154399
ABSTRACT
Balancing risks and benefits is a necessary ethical task for social science researchers. Community psychologists must often consider risks and benefits not just for individual participants, but also for the group, system, or society that those individuals inhabit. Little ethical guidance currently exists for how to navigate this ethical challenge across these multiple levels. In this article, we use a case example of social network research incorporating multiple levels of analysis to identify common risks and benefits and understand their relationship to each other. We conclude by discussing distinctive ethical considerations revealed by this case example.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Grupo Paritario / Psicología / Delitos Sexuales / Apoyo Social / Sobrevivientes / Ética en Investigación Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Community Psychol Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Grupo Paritario / Psicología / Delitos Sexuales / Apoyo Social / Sobrevivientes / Ética en Investigación Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Community Psychol Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos