Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Open versus laparoscopic approach to gastric fundoplication in children with cardiac risk factors.
Maizlin, Ilan Igor; Shroyer, Michelle C; Beierle, Elizabeth A; Chen, Mike K; Russell, Robert T.
Afiliación
  • Maizlin II; Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital of Alabama, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama. Electronic address: ilan.maizlin@childrensal.org.
  • Shroyer MC; Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital of Alabama, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Beierle EA; Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital of Alabama, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Chen MK; Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital of Alabama, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Russell RT; Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital of Alabama, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama.
J Surg Res ; 220: 52-58, 2017 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29180211
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Gastric fundoplication is the most common noncardiac operation in children with congenital cardiac disease. While prior studies validated safety of laparoscopy in this population, we hypothesize that children with cardiac risk factors (CRFs) are likelier to undergo open fundoplication (OF) but experience greater morbidity than after laparoscopic fundoplication (LF). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Utilizing 2013 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatrics Public-Use-File, pediatric patients undergoing LF and OF were stratified to none, minor, major, or severe CRFs. Multivariate logistic regression determined preoperative variables and postoperative outcomes associated with LF or OF.

RESULTS:

A total of 1501 fundoplication patients were identified with 92% undergoing LF. OF patients were likelier to have minor (odds ratio [OR] 2.36, P < 0.001), major (OR 2.41, P = 0.003), and severe CRFs (OR 4.36, P < 0.001). Children ≤ 1 y (OR 3.38, P = 0.048) and those with tracheostomy were likelier to have OF (OR 2.3, P = 0.006). Overall, the OF group had higher postoperative morbidity (OR 2.41, P < 0.001). Specifically, children with minor or major CRFs experienced more complications following OF compared to LF.

CONCLUSIONS:

OF is more common in patients ≤1 y old; patients with minor, major, or severe CRFs; and those with tracheostomy. LF should be considered in children with minor and major CRFs, as OF in those patients results in greater pulmonary, infectious, and hematological sequelae.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Reflujo Gastroesofágico / Laparoscopía / Fundoplicación / Cardiopatías Congénitas Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Res Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Reflujo Gastroesofágico / Laparoscopía / Fundoplicación / Cardiopatías Congénitas Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Res Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article