Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Endoscopic ultrasound for rectal cancer staging: A population-based study of utilization, impact on treatment patterns, and survival.
Okafor, Philip N; Swanson, Kristi; Shah, Nilay; Talwalkar, Jayant A.
Afiliación
  • Okafor PN; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Swanson K; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Shah N; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Talwalkar JA; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 33(8): 1469-1476, 2018 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29372573
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

AIM:

Optimal rectal cancer (RC) outcomes depend on accurate locoregional staging. The study sought to describe the impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) on RC treatment patterns and survival.

METHODS:

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database, the study identified patients with RC between 2005 and 2007. The study excluded patients with stage IV disease, those not enrolled in Medicare parts A and B, those enrolled in managed care, and those staged with pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (because of low numbers). The study then compared outcomes between patients who received EUS and computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis (CTAP) to those staged with CTAP alone after propensity score matching.

RESULTS:

Between 2005 and 2007, we identified 3,408 nonmetastatic RC patients. Compared with patients staged with CTAP alone, those who received EUS and CTAP were younger (median age 75 vs 76 years, P < 0.0001), more likely men (57.6% vs 48.7%, P < 0.0001), with a lower Charlson comorbidity index (P < 0.0001). Predictors of EUS included socioeconomic status (highest vs lowest) (odds ratio [OR] 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-2.5), care by a gastroenterologist (OR 1.713, 95% CI 1.38-2.13), and care in a teaching hospital (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.35-2.08). Receipt of neoadjuvant chemoradiation was higher in EUS-staged patients (50.3% vs 16.0%, P < 0.0001). EUS-staged patients had longer overall survival compared with those staged with CTAP alone (60 vs 57 months), but this was not statistically significant (P = 0.24).

CONCLUSION:

Endoscopic ultrasound in RC staging is associated with higher utilization of neoadjuvant chemoradiation without a significant difference in overall survival.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias del Recto / Endosonografía / Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Gastroenterol Hepatol Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias del Recto / Endosonografía / Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Gastroenterol Hepatol Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos