Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Factors Associated With Positive Margins in Women Undergoing Breast Conservation Surgery.
Murphy, Brittany L; Boughey, Judy C; Keeney, Michael G; Glasgow, Amy E; Racz, Jennifer M; Keeney, Gary L; Habermann, Elizabeth B.
Afiliación
  • Murphy BL; Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Boughey JC; Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Keeney MG; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Glasgow AE; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Racz JM; Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Keeney GL; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Habermann EB; Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Electronic address: Habermann.Elizabeth@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 93(4): 429-435, 2018 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29439832
OBJECTIVE: To identify factors predicting positive margins at lumpectomy prompting intraoperative reexcision in patients with breast cancer treated at a large referral center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed all breast cancer lumpectomy cases managed at our institution from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2013. Associations between rates of positive margin and patient and tumor factors were assessed using χ2 tests and univariate and adjusted multivariate logistic regression, stratified by ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive cancer. RESULTS: We identified 382 patients who underwent lumpectomy for definitive surgical resection of breast cancer, 102 for DCIS and 280 for invasive cancer. Overall, 234 patients (61.3%) required intraoperative reexcision for positive margins. The reexcision rate was higher in patients with DCIS than in those with invasive disease (78.4% [80 of 102] vs 56.4% [158 of 280]; univariate odds ratio, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.66-4.76; P<.001). Positive margin rates did not vary by patient age, surgeon, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, or ERBB2 status of the tumor. Among the 280 cases of invasive breast cancer, the only factor independently associated with lower odds of margin positivity was seed localization vs no localization (P=.03). CONCLUSION: Ductal carcinoma in situ was associated with a higher rate of positive margins at lumpectomy than invasive breast cancer on univariate analysis. Within invasive disease, seed localization was associated with lower rates of margin positivity.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Mastectomía Segmentaria / Carcinoma Ductal de Mama / Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante / Márgenes de Escisión Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Mayo Clin Proc Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Mastectomía Segmentaria / Carcinoma Ductal de Mama / Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante / Márgenes de Escisión Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Mayo Clin Proc Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article