Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Push dose pressors: Experience in critically ill patients outside of the operating room.
Rotando, Andrew; Picard, Lindsey; Delibert, Samantha; Chase, Karin; Jones, Courtney M C; Acquisto, Nicole M.
Afiliación
  • Rotando A; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave., Box 655, Rochester, NY 14642, United States of America.
  • Picard L; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave., Box 655, Rochester, NY 14642, United States of America.
  • Delibert S; Department of Pharmacy, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave., Box 638, Rochester, NY 14642, United States of America.
  • Chase K; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave., Box 655, Rochester, NY 14642, United States of America; Department of Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Care, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave., Rochester, NY 14642, United States of Amer
  • Jones CMC; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave., Box 655, Rochester, NY 14642, United States of America.
  • Acquisto NM; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave., Box 655, Rochester, NY 14642, United States of America; Department of Pharmacy, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave., Box 638, Rochester, NY 14642, United States of America. Electronic add
Am J Emerg Med ; 37(3): 494-498, 2019 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30553634
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Evaluate push dose vasopressor (PDP) practice patterns, efficacy, and safety in critically ill patients.

METHODS:

Critically ill patients receiving phenylephrine or ephedrine PDP from November 2015-March 2017 were included. Patient demographics, medication administration details, vital signs pre- and post-administration, adverse effects, and medications errors were collected. Descriptive data are presented and comparisons were made with paired samples t-test, Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Chi-squared analysis or Fisher's Exact Test as appropriate.

RESULTS:

A total of 146 patients (155 PDP events) were included; mean age 64.5 ±â€¯13.3 years and 66.4% males, respiratory failure (39.8%) or sepsis (24.9%) admission diagnosis. The surgical intensive care unit (ICU) (44.5%) and medical ICU (33.6%) used PDPs most often, and during the peri-intubation period (57.3%) or for other transient hypotension (38.2%). Following PDP, mean systolic blood pressure (BP), diastolic BP, and heart rate (HR) increased 32.5% (80 to 106 mmHg), 27.2% (48 to 61 mmHg), and 6.4% (93 to 99 bpm), respectively. There were 17 (11.6%) adverse events; most often related to excessive increases in BP or HR and one incidence of dysrhythmia. Thirteen patients (11.2%) had a dose related medication error (phenylephrine dose >200 µg or ephedrine dose >25 mg), nine (6.2%) received PDP with normal/elevated hemodynamics (systolic BP > 100 mmHg or HR > 160 bpm) and 15% while on a continuous infusion vasopressor.

CONCLUSION:

PDPs were used in a variety of patient diagnoses and for select indications. Overall, they were efficacious but associated with adverse drug events and medication errors.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Vasoconstrictores / Cuidados Críticos / Hipotensión Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Am J Emerg Med Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Vasoconstrictores / Cuidados Críticos / Hipotensión Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Am J Emerg Med Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos