Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Improving women's knowledge about prenatal screening in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome - development and acceptability of a low literacy decision aid.
Smith, Sian Karen; Cai, Antonia; Wong, Michelle; Sousa, Mariana S; Peate, Michelle; Welsh, Alec; Meiser, Bettina; Kaur, Rajneesh; Halliday, Jane; Lewis, Sharon; Trevena, Lyndal; Yanes, Tatiane; Barlow-Stewart, Kristine; Barclay, Margot.
Afiliación
  • Smith SK; Psychosocial Research Group, Lowy Research Centre, C25, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Corner High and Botany St, Kensington, Sydney New South Wales, 2033, Australia. sian.smith@unsw.edu.au.
  • Cai A; Psychosocial Research Group, Lowy Research Centre, C25, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Corner High and Botany St, Kensington, Sydney New South Wales, 2033, Australia.
  • Wong M; Psychosocial Research Group, Lowy Research Centre, C25, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Corner High and Botany St, Kensington, Sydney New South Wales, 2033, Australia.
  • Sousa MS; Psychosocial Research Group, Lowy Research Centre, C25, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Corner High and Botany St, Kensington, Sydney New South Wales, 2033, Australia.
  • Peate M; Centre for Applied Nursing Research, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Ingham, Sydney, Australia.
  • Welsh A; South Western Sydney Local Health District, Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.
  • Meiser B; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
  • Kaur R; School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • Halliday J; Department of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, Australia.
  • Lewis S; Psychosocial Research Group, Lowy Research Centre, C25, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Corner High and Botany St, Kensington, Sydney New South Wales, 2033, Australia.
  • Trevena L; Psychosocial Research Group, Lowy Research Centre, C25, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Corner High and Botany St, Kensington, Sydney New South Wales, 2033, Australia.
  • Yanes T; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
  • Barlow-Stewart K; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
  • Barclay M; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 18(1): 499, 2018 Dec 17.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30558569
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Access to information about prenatal screening is important particularly in light of new techniques such as non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). This study aimed to develop and examine the acceptability of a low literacy decision aid (DA) about Down syndrome screening among pregnant women with varying education levels and GPs.

METHODS:

We developed a DA booklet providing information about first-trimester combined testing, maternal serum screening, and NIPT. GPs and women participated in a telephone interview to examine the acceptability of the DA and measure screening knowledge before and after reading the DA. The knowledge measure was designed to assess whether women had understood the gist of the information presented in the decision aid. It comprised conceptual questions (e.g. screening tells you the chance of having a baby with Down syndrome) and numeric questions (e.g. the accuracy of different screening tests).

RESULTS:

Twenty-nine women and 18 GPs participated. Regardless of education level, most women found the booklet 'very' clearly presented (n = 22, 76%), and 'very' informative (n = 23, 80%). Overall, women's conceptual and numeric knowledge improved after exposure to the DA, from 4% having adequate knowledge to 69%. Women's knowledge of NIPT also improved after receiving the decision aid, irrespective of education. Most GPs found it 'very' clearly presented (n = 13, 72%), and that it would 'very much' facilitate decision-making (n = 16, 89%).

CONCLUSIONS:

The DA was found to be acceptable to women as well as GPs. A comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy of the decision aid compared to standard information is an important next step. Strategies are needed on how to implement the tool in practice.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Folletos / Diagnóstico Prenatal / Síndrome de Down / Mujeres Embarazadas / Alfabetización en Salud Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Asunto de la revista: OBSTETRICIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Folletos / Diagnóstico Prenatal / Síndrome de Down / Mujeres Embarazadas / Alfabetización en Salud Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Asunto de la revista: OBSTETRICIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia