Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mapping stakeholders and policies in response to deliberate biological events.
Katz, Rebecca; Graeden, Ellie; Abe, Keishi; Attal-Juncqua, Aurelia; Boyce, Matthew R; Eaneff, Stephanie.
Afiliación
  • Katz R; Georgetown University Center for Global Health Science and Security, 3900 Reservoir Road, NW Washington, DC 20007, USA.
  • Graeden E; Talus Analytics, Boulder, CO, USA.
  • Abe K; Georgetown University Center for Global Health Science and Security, 3900 Reservoir Road, NW Washington, DC 20007, USA.
  • Attal-Juncqua A; Georgetown University Center for Global Health Science and Security, 3900 Reservoir Road, NW Washington, DC 20007, USA.
  • Boyce MR; Georgetown University Center for Global Health Science and Security, 3900 Reservoir Road, NW Washington, DC 20007, USA.
  • Eaneff S; Talus Analytics, Boston, MA, USA.
Heliyon ; 4(12): e01091, 2018 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30603719
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Recent infectious disease outbreaks have brought increased attention to the need to strengthen global capacity to prevent, detect, and respond to natural biological threats. However, deliberate biological events also represent a significant global threat, but have received relatively little attention. While the Biological Weapons Convention provides a foundation for the response to deliberate biological events, the political mechanisms to respond to and recover from such an event are poorly defined.

METHODS:

We performed an analysis of the epidemiological timeline, the international policies triggered as a notional deliberate biological event unfolds, and the corresponding stakeholders and mandates assigned by each policy.

FINDINGS:

The results of this analysis identify a significant gap in both policy and stakeholder mandates there is no single policy nor stakeholder mandate for leading and coordinating response activities associated with a deliberate biological event. These results were visualized using an open source web-based tool published at https//dbe.talusanalytics.com.

INTERPRETATION:

While there are organizations and stakeholders responsible for leading security or public health response, these roles are non-overlapping and are led by organizations not with limited interaction outside such events. The lack of mandates highlights a gap in the mechanisms available to coordinate response and a gap in guidance for managing the response. The results of the analysis corroborate anecdotal evidence from stakeholder meetings and highlight a critical need and gap in deliberate biological response policy.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Heliyon Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Heliyon Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos