Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bowel resection rate but not bowel related morbidity is decreased after interval debulking surgery compared to primary surgery in patents with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer.
Tozzi, Roberto; Casarin, Jvan; Baysal, Ahmet; Valenti, Gaetano; Kilic, Yakup; Majd, Hooman Soleymani; Morotti, Matteo.
Afiliación
  • Tozzi R; Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Nuffield Department of Women and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. roberto.tozzi@wrh.ox.ac.uk.
  • Casarin J; Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Nuffield Department of Women and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Baysal A; Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Nuffield Department of Women and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Valenti G; Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Nuffield Department of Women and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Kilic Y; Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Nuffield Department of Women and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Majd HS; Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Nuffield Department of Women and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Morotti M; Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Nuffield Department of Women and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
J Gynecol Oncol ; 30(2): e25, 2019 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30740956
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the morbidity associate with rectosigmoid resection (RSR) in patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer (OC) undergone primary debulking surgery (PDS) vs. interval debulking surgery (IDS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

METHODS:

From the Oxford Advanced OC database, we retrieved all patients who underwent surgery between January 2009 and July 2016 and included all patients who underwent RSR. We compared the rates of overall related and not-related morbidity and bowel diversion in patients undergone RSR during PDS vs. IDS.

RESULTS:

Three hundred and seventy-one patients underwent surgery 126 in PDS group and 245 in IDS group. Fifty-two patients in the PDS group (41.3%) and 65 patients in IDS group (26.5%) underwent RSR (p<0.001). Overall not related morbidity rate was 37.5% and 28.6%, p=0.625. Bowel specific complications affected 16.3% vs. 11.1% of the patients (p=0.577). IDS group had higher rate of bowel diversion compared with PDS (46.0% vs. 26.5%, p=0.048).

CONCLUSION:

NACT was associated to an overall reduced rate of RSR compared to IDS. No differences in overall related and not-related complications in patients requiring RSR were seen between the 2 groups. Patients in the IDS group had a significantly higher rate of bowel diversion.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Ováricas / Recto / Colon Sigmoide / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Gynecol Oncol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Ováricas / Recto / Colon Sigmoide / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Gynecol Oncol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido