Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Hemodynamic characterization of aortic stenosis states.
Abbas, Amr E; Pibarot, Philippe.
Afiliación
  • Abbas AE; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan.
  • Pibarot P; Department of Internal Medicine, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Auburn Hills, Michigan.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 93(5): 1002-1023, 2019 04 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30790429
ABSTRACT
Aortic stenosis (AS) has become an increasingly prevalent clinical condition, as a result of the "greying of the population", the widespread application of sophisticated diagnostic tools including non-invasive imaging and invasive techniques, and the advent of minimally invasive surgical and percutaneous valve therapies. The diagnosis of severe AS traditionally has relied on the assessment of the mean transvalvular gradient (ΔPmean ) and aortic valve area (AVA) by either echocardiography or catheterization. However, other hemodynamic variables as flow, pressure recovery, and jet eccentricity also play a major role in determining the final hemodynamic state of AS. Moreover, mismatch between ΔPmean and AVA as in low flow low gradient AS and discordance between catheterization and echocardiographic studies in grading severity of AS have increased the complexity of AS diagnosis. The present case-based treatise emphasizes a multi-modality approach to delineation of the hemodynamic pathophysiology of different AS states. KEY POINTS Reduction in the aortic valve area, flow across the aortic valve, and direction of the aortic stenosis jet determine the pressure gradient generated across the aortic valve in patients with aortic stenosis. Discordance between echo and catheterization maximum gradients is related to the inherent temporal differences between the times of their acquisition. Discordance between echo and catheterization mean gradients is related to pressure recovery and assumptions in the application of Bernoulli equation to estimate the aortic valve gradient. Pressure recovery relates to the ratio of the aortic valve area and ascending aortic diameter as well as the jet direction. Mismatch between area and gradient criteria for aortic stenosis severity may occur with or without concordance between echocardiographic and catheterization data. Errors of measurement should be excluded prior to assuming any mismatch or discordance between the data. Area gradient mismatch occurs when the aortic valve area is in the severe range, while the gradient is in the non-severe range as in low flow low gradient aortic stenosis. Reverse area gradient mismatch occurs when the gradient is in the severe range, while the aortic valve area is in the non-severe range as in congenital aortic stenosis with an eccentric jet.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Válvula Aórtica / Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica / Cateterismo Cardíaco / Ecocardiografía Doppler / Hemodinámica Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Asunto de la revista: CARDIOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Válvula Aórtica / Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica / Cateterismo Cardíaco / Ecocardiografía Doppler / Hemodinámica Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Asunto de la revista: CARDIOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article