Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Exploring Australian residents cycling engagement - Differences in self-reported cycling behaviour between urban and rural dwelling Queenslanders.
King, Jemma C; Franklin, Richard C; Devine, Sue; Watt, Kerrianne; Leggat, Peter A.
Afiliación
  • King JC; World Safety Organisation Collaborating Centre for Injury Prevention and Safety Promotion, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld, Australia.
  • Franklin RC; Dislipline of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld, Australia.
  • Devine S; World Safety Organisation Collaborating Centre for Injury Prevention and Safety Promotion, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld, Australia.
  • Watt K; Dislipline of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld, Australia.
  • Leggat PA; Dislipline of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld, Australia.
Health Promot J Austr ; 31(1): 93-103, 2020 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31002469
ABSTRACT
ISSUE ADDRESSED Cycling participation rates in Australia and Queensland remain low. Rural residents typically do not have distinct cycling infrastructure available for use. Investigating current cycling participation and barriers to cycling engagement will inform future work to promote cycling engagement.

METHODS:

Data were collected through the inclusion of cycling-related questions in the 2012 Queensland Social Survey.

RESULTS:

The majority of the sample had not cycled in the previous 12 months (66%; n = 831). Significantly more rural residents reported not cycling due to environmental concerns (P < 0.05) and preferring other modes of transport or exercise (P < 0.01). Rural cyclists (31.4%; n = 113) had higher levels of cycling engagement in the previous week (41.6% to 32.6% urban; χ2  = 7.83; n = 420; P < 0.05) but lower cycling durations than urban cyclists (41.6% rural residents cycling for 30+ minutes vs 57.4% urban residents; χ2  = 8.25; n = 418; P < 0.01). Rural cycling engagement was independently associated with being male (OR = 2.34; 95% CI = 1.40-3.91); sufficient physical activity engagement (OR = 1.86; 95% CI = 1.10-3.15); and having children at place of residence (1-2 children OR = 3.21; 95% CI = 1.88-5.49; 3+ children OR = 3.01; 95% CI = 1.17-7.75).

CONCLUSIONS:

One-third of all adults cycled in the previous 12 months irrespective of location; however reasons for not cycling varied by urban/rural location. Results indicate that environmental factors appear to be inhibiting cycling participation in rural areas. Advocating for government commitment for infrastructure development to support safe cycling across Queensland including outside of metropolitan areas is required. SO WHAT? This research explores self-reported cycling engagement amongst a sample of urban and rural dwelling Queenslanders. Differences in cycling exposure and reasons for lack of engagement offer insights into what may encourage greater cycling participation.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Población Rural / Población Urbana / Ciclismo Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Health Promot J Austr Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Población Rural / Población Urbana / Ciclismo Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Health Promot J Austr Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia