Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Obstetrical outcomes after first-trimester chorionic villus sampling in twin pregnancies: A retrospective case-control study.
Kim, Mi S; Ahn, Eunhee; Lee, Soo B; Moon, Myoung J; Kang, Sukho.
Afiliación
  • Kim MS; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.
  • Ahn E; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee SB; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.
  • Moon MJ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.
  • Kang S; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 45(8): 1466-1471, 2019 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31099123
ABSTRACT

AIM:

Prenatal diagnostic testing by chorionic villus sampling (CVS) is sometimes recommended for women with twin pregnancies. However, few studies have compared the outcomes between twins with CVS and control twins without intervention. This study aimed to compare the obstetrical outcomes of CVS in twin pregnancies and those in non-intervention twin pregnancies.

METHODS:

First-trimester transabdominal CVS was performed on dichorionic-diamniotic twins (n = 54; Group 1) between December 2006 and January 2017 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at our hospital, and the data were retrospectively analyzed. CVS risks were evaluated by comparing obstetrical outcomes with those of a control population of 155 dichorionic-diamniotic twins without intervention (Group 2).

RESULTS:

The difference in the overall fetal loss rate (Group 1, 7.4% vs Group 2, 3.9%; P = 0.287) between the two groups was not statistically significant. The miscarriage rate, defined as delivery at <24 gestational weeks, and early preterm delivery, defined as delivery at <34 gestational weeks, were not significant between the groups (miscarriage Group 1, 5.6% vs Group 2, 3.2%; P = 0.428; early preterm delivery Group 1, 11.1% vs Group 2, 9.0%; P = 0.788). The mean gestational age at delivery, birth weights and neonatal intensive care unit admission rate were not statistically significant between the groups. Thus, the overall fetal loss rate and obstetrical outcomes of Group 1 were comparable with those of Group 2.

CONCLUSION:

In conclusion, the overall obstetrical outcomes were not significantly different between twins with CVS and control twins with the advantage of enabling early decision-making about selective feticide in twins with CVS.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Resultado del Embarazo / Muestra de la Vellosidad Coriónica / Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal / Muerte Fetal / Embarazo Gemelar / Trabajo de Parto Prematuro Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: J Obstet Gynaecol Res Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Resultado del Embarazo / Muestra de la Vellosidad Coriónica / Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal / Muerte Fetal / Embarazo Gemelar / Trabajo de Parto Prematuro Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: J Obstet Gynaecol Res Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article