Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Nitric Oxide Products are not Associated with Metabolic Syndrome.
Klisic, Aleksandra; Kocic, Gordana; Kavaric, Nebojsa; Pavlovic, Radmila; Soldatovic, Ivan; Ninic, Ana.
Afiliación
  • Klisic A; Primary Health Care Center, University of Montenegro - Faculty of Medicine, Podgorica, Montenegro.
  • Kocic G; Department of Medical Biochemistry, University of Nis - School of Medicine, Nis, Serbia.
  • Kavaric N; Primary Health Care Center, University of Montenegro - Faculty of Medicine, Podgorica, Montenegro.
  • Pavlovic R; Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • Soldatovic I; Institute for Biostatistics, Medical informatics and researches in Medicine, University of Belgrade - Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Ninic A; Department of Medical Biochemistry, University of Belgrade - Faculty of Pharmacy, Belgrade, Serbia.
J Med Biochem ; 38(3): 361-367, 2019 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31156347
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Nitric oxide (NO) is oxidative stress biomarker which is regarded as one of the key determinants of energy metabolism and vascular tone. Considering the controversial reports on the association between nitric oxide products (NOx) and metabolic syndrome (MetS), the aim of the current study was to examine that potential relationship. Additionally, we aimed to evaluate a broad spectrum of other oxidative stress biomarkers [i.e., malondialdehyde (MDA), advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP), xanthine oxidoreductase (XOD), xanthine oxidase (XO) xanthine dehydrogenase (XDH)] in relation with MetS.

METHODS:

A total of 109 volunteers (46.8% of them with MetS) were included in this cross-sectional study. Biohemical and anthropometric parameters, as well as blood pressure, were obtained. The MetS was diagnosed according to the International Diabetes Federation criteria.

RESULTS:

Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that XOD (OR=1.011; 95% CI 1.002-1.019; p=0.016), XO (OR=1.014; 95% CI 1.003-1.026; p=0.016), MDA (OR=1.113; 95% CI 1.038-1.192; p=0.003) and AOPP (OR=1.022; 95% CI 1.005-1.039; p=0.012) were the independent predictors of MetS, whereas no association between NOx and MetS was found. As XOD rose for 1 U/L, XO for 1 U/L, MDA for 1 µmol/L and AOPP for 1 T/L, probability for MetS rose for 1.1%, 1.4%, 11.3% and 2.2%, respectively. Adjusted R2 for the Model was 0.531, which means that 53.1% of variation in MetS could be explained with this Model.

CONCLUSION:

Unlike XOD, MDA and AOPP, NOx is not associated with MetS.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Med Biochem Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Med Biochem Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article