Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A systematic review on the utility of non-invasive electrophysiological assessment in evaluating for intra uterine growth restriction.
Smith, Vinayak; Nair, Amrish; Warty, Ritesh; Sursas, Joel Arun; da Silva Costa, Fabricio; Wallace, Euan Morrison.
Afiliación
  • Smith V; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, 252 Clayton Road, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia. Vinayak.smith@monash.edu.
  • Nair A; Biorithm Pte Ltd, 81 Ayer Rajah Crescent 03-53, Singapore, 139967, Singapore. Vinayak.smith@monash.edu.
  • Warty R; Biorithm Pte Ltd, 81 Ayer Rajah Crescent 03-53, Singapore, 139967, Singapore.
  • Sursas JA; Biorithm Pte Ltd, 81 Ayer Rajah Crescent 03-53, Singapore, 139967, Singapore.
  • da Silva Costa F; Biorithm Pte Ltd, 81 Ayer Rajah Crescent 03-53, Singapore, 139967, Singapore.
  • Wallace EM; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, 252 Clayton Road, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 19(1): 230, 2019 Jul 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31277600
BACKGROUND: Non-invasive electrophysiological assessment (NIEA) is an evolving area in fetal surveillance and is attracting increasing research interest. There is however, limited data outlining its utility in evaluating intra uterine growth restriction (IUGR). The objective of this study was to carry out a systematic review to outline the utility of NIEA parameters in evaluating IUGR. METHODS: A systematic review of peer reviewed literature was performed, searching PUBMED, Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE. The outcomes of interest included NIEA parameters [P wave duration, PR interval, QRS duration, QT interval, T/QRS ratio, short term variability (STV) and long term variability (LTV)] and a descriptive summary of relevant studies as well. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were identified as suitable for inclusion. The utility of NIEA parameters were investigated in tabular form. In particular, QRS and QT duration, T/QRS ratio, STV and PRSA analysis displayed utility and merit further consideration in evaluating for IUGR. Issues identified in the review were in relation to variances in definition of IUGR, small sample sizes and the lack of technological consistency across studies. CONCLUSION: NIEA shows promise as an adjunct surveillance tool in fetal diagnostics for IUGR. Larger prospective studies should be directed towards establishing reliable parameters with a focus on uniformity of IUGR definition, technological consistency and the individualisation of NIEA parameters.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Diagnóstico Prenatal / Electrocardiografía / Magnetocardiografía / Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal / Corazón Fetal Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Asunto de la revista: OBSTETRICIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Diagnóstico Prenatal / Electrocardiografía / Magnetocardiografía / Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal / Corazón Fetal Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Asunto de la revista: OBSTETRICIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia