Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Longer distance to specialized treatment centers does not adversely affect treatment intensity or outcomes in adult acute myeloid leukemia patients. A Danish national population-based cohort study.
Tøstesen, Michael; Nørgaard, Mette; Nørgaard, Jan Maxwell; Medeiros, Bruno C; Marcher, Claus Werenberg; Overgaard, Ulrik Malthe; Severinsen, Marianne Tang; Schoellkopf, Claudia; Østgård, Lene Sofie Granfeldt.
Afiliación
  • Tøstesen M; Department of Clinical Medicine, Holstebro Regional Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Nørgaard M; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Nørgaard JM; Department of Hematology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Medeiros BC; Department of Hematology, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Marcher CW; Department of Hematology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
  • Overgaard UM; Department of Hematology, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Severinsen MT; Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
  • Schoellkopf C; Department of Hematology, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
  • Østgård LSG; Department of Clinical Medicine, Holstebro Regional Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Clin Epidemiol ; 11: 769-780, 2019.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31695504
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is widely centralized. Longer distances to a specialized treatment center may affect patients' access to curative-intended treatment. Especially during outpatient treatment, distance may also affect survival. METHODS AND PATIENTS The authors conducted a national population-based cohort study including all AML patients diagnosed in Denmark between 2000 and 2014. We investigated effects of distance (<10 kilometers [km; reference], 10-25, 25-50, 50-100, >100) to the nearest specialized treatment facility on the probability of receiving intensive chemotherapy, HSCT, and achieving a complete remission (CR) using logistic regression analysis (odds ratios; ORs). For overall survival, we used Cox proportional hazards regression (hazard ratios [HRs]) and adjusted (a) for relevant baseline characteristics.

RESULTS:

Of 2,992 patients (median age=68.5 years), 53% received intensive chemotherapy and 12% received low-dose chemotherapy outpatient regimens. The median distance to a specialized treatment center was 40 km (interquartile range=10-77 km). No impact of distance to specialized treatment centers was seen on the probability of receiving intensive chemotherapy (10-25 km, aOR=1.1 (CI=0.7-1.7), 25-50 km, aOR=1.1 (CI=0.7-1.7), 50-100 km, aOR=1.3 (CI=0.9-1.9), and >100 km, aOR=1.4 [CI=0.9-2.2]). Overall survival in patients regardless of therapy (<10 km, aOR=1.0 vs >100 km, aOR=1.0 [CI=0.9-1.2]), in intensive therapy patients, or in patients' choice of post-remission was not affected by distance to specialized treatment center. Distance to a transplant center also did not affect the probability of HSCT or survival post-HSCT.

CONCLUSION:

In Denmark, distance to a specialized treatment facility offering remission-induction chemotherapy and HSCT does not negatively affect access to curative-indented therapy, treatment-response, or survival in AML patients.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Clin Epidemiol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Clin Epidemiol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca