Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Integration of the Duke Activity Status Index into preoperative risk evaluation: a multicentre prospective cohort study.
Wijeysundera, Duminda N; Beattie, W Scott; Hillis, Graham S; Abbott, Tom E F; Shulman, Mark A; Ackland, Gareth L; Mazer, C David; Myles, Paul S; Pearse, Rupert M; Cuthbertson, Brian H; Myles, P S; Shulman, M A; Wallace, S; Farrington, C; Thompson, B; Ellis, M; Borg, B; Kerridge, R K; Douglas, J; Brannan, J; Pretto, J; Godsall, M G; Beauchamp, N; Allen, S; Kennedy, A; Wright, E; Malherbe, J; Ismail, H; Riedel, B; Melville, A; Sivakumar, H; Murmane, A; Kenchington, K; Kirabiyik, Y; Gurunathan, U; Stonell, C; Brunello, K; Steele, K; Tronstad, O; Masel, P; Dent, A; Smith, E; Bodger, A; Abolfathi, M; Sivalingam, P; Hall, A; Painter, T W; Macklin, S; Elliott, A; Carrera, A M.
Afiliación
  • Wijeysundera DN; Department of Anesthesia, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Univer
  • Beattie WS; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Hillis GS; Department of Cardiology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Abbott TEF; The William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Shulman MA; Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Ackland GL; The William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Mazer CD; Department of Anesthesia, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Myles PS; Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Pearse RM; Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Cuthbertson BH; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Myles PS; Alfred Hospital, Australia.
  • Shulman MA; Alfred Hospital, Australia.
  • Wallace S; Alfred Hospital, Australia.
  • Farrington C; Alfred Hospital, Australia.
  • Thompson B; Alfred Hospital, Australia.
  • Ellis M; Alfred Hospital, Australia.
  • Borg B; Alfred Hospital, Australia.
  • Kerridge RK; John Hunter Hospital, Australia.
  • Douglas J; John Hunter Hospital, Australia.
  • Brannan J; John Hunter Hospital, Australia.
  • Pretto J; John Hunter Hospital, Australia.
  • Godsall MG; Nambour General Hospital, Australia.
  • Beauchamp N; Nambour General Hospital, Australia.
  • Allen S; Nambour General Hospital, Australia.
  • Kennedy A; Nambour General Hospital, Australia.
  • Wright E; Nambour General Hospital, Australia.
  • Malherbe J; Nambour General Hospital, Australia.
  • Ismail H; Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Australia.
  • Riedel B; Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Australia.
  • Melville A; Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Australia.
  • Sivakumar H; Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Australia.
  • Murmane A; Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Australia.
  • Kenchington K; Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Australia.
  • Kirabiyik Y; Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Australia.
  • Gurunathan U; Prince Charles Hospital, Australia.
  • Stonell C; Prince Charles Hospital, Australia.
  • Brunello K; Prince Charles Hospital, Australia.
  • Steele K; Prince Charles Hospital, Australia.
  • Tronstad O; Prince Charles Hospital, Australia.
  • Masel P; Prince Charles Hospital, Australia.
  • Dent A; Prince Charles Hospital, Australia.
  • Smith E; Prince Charles Hospital, Australia.
  • Bodger A; Prince Charles Hospital, Australia.
  • Abolfathi M; Prince Charles Hospital, Australia.
  • Sivalingam P; Princess Alexandra Hospital, Australia.
  • Hall A; Princess Alexandra Hospital, Australia.
  • Painter TW; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Australia.
  • Macklin S; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Australia.
  • Elliott A; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Australia.
  • Carrera AM; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Australia.
Br J Anaesth ; 124(3): 261-270, 2020 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31864719
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) questionnaire might help incorporate self-reported functional capacity into preoperative risk assessment. Nonetheless, prognostically important thresholds in DASI scores remain unclear. We conducted a nested cohort analysis of the Measurement of Exercise Tolerance before Surgery (METS) study to characterise the association of preoperative DASI scores with postoperative death or complications.

METHODS:

The analysis included 1546 participants (≥40 yr of age) at an elevated cardiac risk who had inpatient noncardiac surgery. The primary outcome was 30-day death or myocardial injury. The secondary outcomes were 30-day death or myocardial infarction, in-hospital moderate-to-severe complications, and 1 yr death or new disability. Multivariable logistic regression modelling was used to characterise the adjusted association of preoperative DASI scores with outcomes.

RESULTS:

The DASI score had non-linear associations with outcomes. Self-reported functional capacity better than a DASI score of 34 was associated with reduced odds of 30-day death or myocardial injury (odds ratio 0.97 per 1 point increase above 34; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-0.99) and 1 yr death or new disability (odds ratio 0.96 per 1 point increase above 34; 95% CI 0.92-0.99). Self-reported functional capacity worse than a DASI score of 34 was associated with increased odds of 30-day death or myocardial infarction (odds ratio 1.05 per 1 point decrease below 34; 95% CI 1.00-1.09), and moderate-to-severe complications (odds ratio 1.03 per 1 point decrease below 34; 95% CI 1.01-1.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

A DASI score of 34 represents a threshold for identifying patients at risk for myocardial injury, myocardial infarction, moderate-to-severe complications, and new disability.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cuidados Preoperatorios / Indicadores de Salud / Tolerancia al Ejercicio Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Br J Anaesth Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cuidados Preoperatorios / Indicadores de Salud / Tolerancia al Ejercicio Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Br J Anaesth Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article