Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Altering the Course of Technologies to Monitor Loosening States of Endoprosthetic Implants.
Cachão, João Henrique; Soares Dos Santos, Marco P; Bernardo, Rodrigo; Ramos, António; Bader, Rainer; Ferreira, Jorge A F; Torres Marques, António; Simões, José A O.
Afiliación
  • Cachão JH; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
  • Soares Dos Santos MP; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
  • Bernardo R; Center for Mechanical Technology & Automation (TEMA), University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
  • Ramos A; Associated Laboratory for Energy, Transports and Aeronautics (LAETA), 4150-179 Porto, Portugal.
  • Bader R; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
  • Ferreira JAF; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
  • Torres Marques A; Center for Mechanical Technology & Automation (TEMA), University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
  • Simões JAO; Department of Orthopedics, University Medicine Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Sensors (Basel) ; 20(1)2019 Dec 23.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31878028
ABSTRACT
Musculoskeletal disorders are becoming an ever-growing societal burden and, as a result, millions of bone replacements surgeries are performed per year worldwide. Despite total joint replacements being recognized among the most successful surgeries of the last century, implant failure rates exceeding 10% are still reported. These numbers highlight the necessity of technologies to provide an accurate monitoring of the bone-implant interface state. This study provides a detailed review of the most relevant methodologies and technologies already proposed to monitor the loosening states of endoprosthetic implants, as well as their performance and experimental validation. A total of forty-two papers describing both intracorporeal and extracorporeal technologies for cemented or cementless fixation were thoroughly analyzed. Thirty-eight technologies were identified, which are categorized into five methodologies vibrometric, acoustic, bioelectric impedance, magnetic induction, and strain. Research efforts were mainly focused on vibrometric and acoustic technologies. Differently, approaches based on bioelectric impedance, magnetic induction and strain have been less explored. Although most technologies are noninvasive and are able to monitor different loosening stages of endoprosthetic implants, they are not able to provide effective monitoring during daily living of patients.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Falla de Prótesis / Trasplante Óseo Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sensors (Basel) Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Portugal

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Falla de Prótesis / Trasplante Óseo Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sensors (Basel) Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Portugal