Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging on biopsy and radical prostatectomy grade concordance.
Shoag, Jonathan E; Cai, Peter Y; Gross, Michael D; Gaffney, Christopher; Li, Dongze; Mao, Jialin; Nowels, Molly; Scherr, Douglas S; Sedrakyan, Art; Hu, Jim C.
Afiliación
  • Shoag JE; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
  • Cai PY; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
  • Gross MD; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
  • Gaffney C; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
  • Li D; Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
  • Mao J; Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
  • Nowels M; Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
  • Scherr DS; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
  • Sedrakyan A; Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
  • Hu JC; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Cancer ; 126(13): 2986-2990, 2020 07 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32320063
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Adoption of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before biopsy is based on evidence demonstrating superior detection of clinically significant prostate cancer on biopsy. Whether this is due to the detection of otherwise occult higher grade cancers or preferential sampling of higher grade areas within an otherwise low-grade cancer is unknown.

METHODS:

To distinguish these two possibilities, this study examined the effect of prebiopsy MRI on the rate of pathologic upgrading and downgrading at prostatectomy in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked data from 2010 to 2015. Logistic regression was performed to assess the effect of MRI use on the Gleason grade change between biopsy and prostatectomy.

RESULTS:

Among biopsy-naive men, those who underwent prebiopsy MRI had higher odds of downgrading at prostatectomy (odds ratio [OR], 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.66). In contrast, the odds of upgrading were significantly lower for men who underwent prebiopsy MRI (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61-0.99). Limitations included a low overall rate of MRI-utilization prior to biopsy and an inability to distinguish between template, software-assisted and cognitive fusion biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS:

Prebiopsy MRI is associated with both oversampling of higher grade areas, which results in downgrading at prostatectomy, and the detection of otherwise occult higher grade lesions, which results in less upgrading at prostatectomy.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Próstata / Prostatectomía / Neoplasias de la Próstata / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Biopsia Guiada por Imagen Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Próstata / Prostatectomía / Neoplasias de la Próstata / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Biopsia Guiada por Imagen Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article