Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Ethical Triage and Management Guidelines of the Entrapped and Mangled Extremity in Resource Scarce Environments: A Systematic Literature Review.
Weinstein, Eric; Gosney, James E; Ragazzoni, Luca; Franc, Jeffrey; Herbert, TeriLynn; Weinstein, Brielle; Verde, Manuela; Zeller, Johannes; Wolfson, Nikolaj; Boyce, Will; Cramer, Jordan.
Afiliación
  • Weinstein E; Research Center in Emergency and Disaster Medicine (CRIMEDIM), Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.
  • Gosney JE; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Geisinger Health System, Bloomsburg, PA.
  • Ragazzoni L; Research Center in Emergency and Disaster Medicine (CRIMEDIM), Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.
  • Franc J; Research Center in Emergency and Disaster Medicine (CRIMEDIM), Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.
  • Herbert T; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.
  • Weinstein B; Library, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
  • Verde M; PGY4 Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of South Florida, Health Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL.
  • Zeller J; Research Center in Emergency and Disaster Medicine (CRIMEDIM), Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.
  • Wolfson N; Department of Anesthesiology, Bundeswehr Central Hospital, Koblenz, Germany.
  • Boyce W; Department of Orthopedics, California Pacific Medical Center, Saint Francis Memorial Hospital, San Francisco, CA.
  • Cramer J; MS4 Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep ; 15(3): 389-397, 2021 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32456743
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed to elucidate the current triage and treatment of an entrapped or mangled extremity in resource scarce environments (RSEs).

METHODS:

A lead researcher followed the search strategy following inclusion and exclusion criteria. A first reviewer (FR) was randomly assigned sources. One of the 2 lead researchers was the second reviewer (SR). Each determined the level of evidence (LOE) and quality of evidence (QE) from each source. Any differing opinions between the FR and SR were discussed between them, and if differing opinions remained, then a third reviewer (the other lead researcher) discussed the article until a consensus was reached. The final opinion of each article was entered for analysis.

RESULTS:

Fifty-eight (58) articles were entered into the final study. There was 1 study determined to be LOE 1, 29 LOE 2, and 28 LOE 3, with 15 determined to achieve QE 1, 37 QE 2, and 6 QE 3.

CONCLUSION:

This SLR showed that there is a lack of studies producing strong evidence to support the triage and treatment of the mangled extremity in RSE. Therefore, a Delphi process is suggested to adapt and modify current civilian and military triage and treatment guidelines to the RSE.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Incidentes con Víctimas en Masa / Personal Militar Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Disaster Med Public Health Prep Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Incidentes con Víctimas en Masa / Personal Militar Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Disaster Med Public Health Prep Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia