Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Trends in the use of computerized physician order entry by health-system affiliated ambulatory clinics in the United States, 2014-2016.
Fischer, Shira H; Rudin, Robert S; Shi, Yunfeng; Shekelle, Paul; Amill-Rosario, Alejandro; Scanlon, Dennis; Damberg, Cheryl L.
Afiliación
  • Fischer SH; RAND Corporation, 20 Park Plaza, Suite 920, Boston, MA, 02116, USA. sfischer@rand.org.
  • Rudin RS; RAND Corporation, 20 Park Plaza, Suite 920, Boston, MA, 02116, USA.
  • Shi Y; Pennsylvania State University, University Park, State College, PA, USA.
  • Shekelle P; RAND Corporation, 1776 Main St, Santa Monica, CA, 90401, USA.
  • Amill-Rosario A; West Los Angeles VA Medical Center, 11301 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90073, USA.
  • Scanlon D; Pennsylvania State University, University Park, State College, PA, USA.
  • Damberg CL; Pennsylvania State University, University Park, State College, PA, USA.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 20(1): 836, 2020 Sep 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32894110
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Computerized provider order entry (CPOE) can help providers deliver better quality care. We aimed to understand recent trends in use of CPOE by health system-affiliated ambulatory clinics.

METHODS:

We analyzed longitudinal data (2014-2016) for 19,109 ambulatory clinics that participated in all 3 years of the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society Analytics survey to assess use of CPOE and identify characteristics of clinics associated with CPOE use. We calculated descriptive statistics to examine overall trends in use, location of order entry (bedside vs. clinical station), and system-level use CPOE across all clinics. We used linear probability models to explore the association between clinic characteristics (practice size, practice type, and health system type) and two outcomes of interest CPOE use at any point between 2014 and 2016, and CPOE use beginning in 2015 or 2016.

RESULTS:

Between 2014 and 2016, use of CPOE increased more than 9 percentage points from 58 to 67%. Larger clinics and those affiliated with multi-hospital health systems were more likely to have reported use of CPOE. We found no difference in CPOE use by primary care versus specialty care clinics. When used, most clinics reported using CPOE for most or all of their orders. Health systems that used CPOE usually did so for all system-affiliated clinics.

CONCLUSIONS:

Small practice size or not being part of a multi-hospital system are associated with lower use of CPOE between 2014 and 2016. Less than optimal use in these environments may be harming patient outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sistemas de Entrada de Órdenes Médicas / Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: BMC Health Serv Res Asunto de la revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sistemas de Entrada de Órdenes Médicas / Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: BMC Health Serv Res Asunto de la revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos