Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Tofacitinib in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis and Metabolic Syndrome: A Post hoc Analysis of Phase 3 Studies.
Ritchlin, Christopher T; Giles, Jon T; Ogdie, Alexis; Gomez-Reino, Juan J; Helliwell, Philip; Young, Pamela; Wang, Cunshan; Wu, Joseph; Romero, Ana Belén; Woolcott, John; Stockert, Lori.
Afiliación
  • Ritchlin CT; University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
  • Giles JT; Columbia University, New York, New York.
  • Ogdie A; Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Gomez-Reino JJ; Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
  • Helliwell P; Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Young P; Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, Pennsylvania.
  • Wang C; Pfizer Inc, Groton, Connecticut.
  • Wu J; Pfizer Inc, Groton, Connecticut.
  • Romero AB; Pfizer Inc, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Woolcott J; Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, Pennsylvania.
  • Stockert L; Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, Pennsylvania.
ACR Open Rheumatol ; 2(10): 543-554, 2020 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32910531
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of concurrent risk factors for cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. This post hoc analysis explored key efficacy and safety endpoints in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and MetS treated with tofacitinib.

METHODS:

Tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg twice daily and placebo data were pooled from two Phase 3 studies (OPAL Broaden [12 months; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01877668]; OPAL Beyond [6 months; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01882439]); patients received one background conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. Patients were stratified by baseline presence/absence of MetS. Efficacy and safety were reported to month 3 (tofacitinib and placebo) and 6 (tofacitinib only). Efficacy outcomes included American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20/50/70, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) response, Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI)75 response, and enthesitis/dactylitis resolution rates; and changes from baseline (Δ) in C-reactive protein, HAQ-DI, Patient's/Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis, and patient-reported outcomes. Safety outcomes included treatment-emergent all-causality adverse events (AEs), Δ in lipid/hepatic values, and liver parameter increases.

RESULTS:

Of 710 patients, 41.4% (n = 294) had baseline MetS. All efficacy outcomes improved with both tofacitinib doses versus placebo, to month 3; tofacitinib efficacy was consistent to month 6, regardless of MetS status. MetS did not appear to affect the incidence of AEs or Δ in lipid/hepatic values with tofacitinib up to month 3 or 6. Arterial thromboembolism and myocardial infarction (adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events) were each reported once in tofacitinib-treated patients with MetS.

CONCLUSION:

Regardless of baseline MetS status, tofacitinib showed greater efficacy versus placebo in patients with active PsA. The tofacitinib safety profile appeared similar in patients with versus without MetS.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: ACR Open Rheumatol Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: ACR Open Rheumatol Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article