Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Tunneled Peritoneal Catheter for Refractory Ascites in Cirrhosis: A Randomized Case-Series.
Kimer, Nina; Riedel, Agnete Nordheim; Hobolth, Lise; Mortensen, Christian; Madsen, Lone Galmstrup; Andersen, Mette Lehmann; Schiødt, Frank Vinholdt; Møller, Søren; Gluud, Lise Lotte.
Afiliación
  • Kimer N; Gastro Unit, Medical Division, Hvidovre University Hospital, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark.
  • Riedel AN; Bridge Translational Excellence Program, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
  • Hobolth L; Gastro Unit, Medical Division, Hvidovre University Hospital, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark.
  • Mortensen C; Gastro Unit, Medical Division, Hvidovre University Hospital, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark.
  • Madsen LG; Gastro Unit, Medical Division, Hvidovre University Hospital, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark.
  • Andersen ML; Department of Clinical Medicine, University Hospital Køge, 4600 Køge, Denmark.
  • Schiødt FV; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
  • Møller S; Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Herlev, 2630 Herlev, Denmark.
  • Gluud LL; Abdominal Center K, University Hospital Bispebjerg, 2400 Copenhagen NV, Denmark.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 56(11)2020 Oct 27.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33121063
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Refractory ascites markedly worsens prognosis in cirrhosis. Large volume paracentesis (LVP) is standard treatment, but complications are common. In a randomized controlled case-series, we assessed a permanent tunneled peritoneal catheter versus LVP in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Random allocation was computer-generated, and concealment used opaque envelopes. Patients were included from January 2017 to December 2018. Inclusion criteria were cirrhosis and recurrent ascites and expected survival of more than 3 months. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were enrolled (PleurX =6 versus LVP = 7). Seven were female, ranging in age from 51 to 80 years. No procedure-related complications occurred. Two patients died due to variceal bleeding (PleurX-group) and sepsis (LVP-group). One patient was withdrawn due to hyponatremia (PleurX-group). Two patients were withdrawn due to bacterial peritonitis and infection of unknown origin (control-group). In the PleurX-group, all patients colonized the catheter, two developed bacterial peritonitis. The most common bacterial colonization was Staph. Epidermidis (n = 4). CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients, the PleurX catheter mobilizes ascites and may be an alternative to LVP. The risk of infection should be considered in each case. The impact of colonization and risk of infections needs further investigation. The present trial does not allow for statistical conclusions.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ascitis / Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Medicina (Kaunas) Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ascitis / Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Medicina (Kaunas) Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca