Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comprehensive analysis of cutaneous and uveal melanoma liver metastases.
Hoefsmit, Esmee P; Rozeman, Elisa A; Van, Trieu My; Dimitriadis, Petros; Krijgsman, Oscar; Conway, Jordan W; Pires da Silva, Ines; van der Wal, Jacqueline E; Ketelaars, Steven L C; Bresser, Kaspar; Broeks, Annegien; Kerkhoven, Ron M; Reeves, Jason W; Warren, Sarah; Kvistborg, Pia; Scolyer, Richard A; Kapiteijn, Ellen W; Peeper, Daniel S; Long, Georgina V; Schumacher, Ton N M; Blank, Christian U.
Afiliación
  • Hoefsmit EP; Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Rozeman EA; Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Van TM; Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Dimitriadis P; Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Krijgsman O; Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Conway JW; Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Pires da Silva I; Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • van der Wal JE; Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Ketelaars SLC; Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Bresser K; Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Broeks A; Core Facility and Biobanking, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Kerkhoven RM; NKI Genomics Core Facility, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Reeves JW; NanoString Technologies Inc, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Warren S; NanoString Technologies Inc, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Kvistborg P; Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Scolyer RA; Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Kapiteijn EW; The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Peeper DS; Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and New South Wales Health Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Long GV; Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Schumacher TNM; Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Blank CU; Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Immunother Cancer ; 8(2)2020 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33262254
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The profound disparity in response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) by cutaneous melanoma (CM) and uveal melanoma (UM) patients is not well understood. Therefore, we characterized metastases of CM and UM from the same metastatic site (liver), in order to dissect the potential underlying mechanism in differential response on ICB.

METHODS:

Tumor liver samples from CM (n=38) and UM (n=28) patients were analyzed at the genomic (whole exome sequencing), transcriptional (RNA sequencing) and protein (immunohistochemistry and GeoMx Digital Spatial Profiling) level.

RESULTS:

Comparison of CM and UM metastases from the same metastatic site revealed that, although originating from the same melanocyte lineage, CM and UM differed in somatic mutation profile, copy number profile, tumor mutational burden (TMB) and consequently predicted neoantigens. A higher melanin content and higher expression of the melanoma differentiation antigen MelanA was observed in liver metastases of UM patients. No difference in B2M and human leukocyte antigen-DR (HLA-DR) expression was observed. A higher expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) was found in CM compared with UM liver metastases, although the majority of CM and UM liver metastases lacked PD-L1 expression. There was no difference in the extent of immune infiltration observed between CM and UM metastases, with the exception of a higher expression of CD163 (p<0.0001) in CM liver samples. While the extent of immune infiltration was similar for CM and UM metastases, the ratio of exhausted CD8 T cells to cytotoxic T cells, to total CD8 T cells and to Th1 cells, was significantly higher in UM metastases.

CONCLUSIONS:

While TMB was different between CM and UM metastases, tumor immune infiltration was similar. The greater dependency on PD-L1 as an immune checkpoint in CM and the identification of higher exhaustion ratios in UM may both serve as explanations for the difference in response to ICB. Consequently, in order to improve current treatment for metastatic UM, reversal of T cell exhaustion beyond programmed cell death 1 blockade should be considered.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Cutáneas / Neoplasias de la Úvea / Melanoma Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Immunother Cancer Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Cutáneas / Neoplasias de la Úvea / Melanoma Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Immunother Cancer Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos