Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost of a new method of active screening for human African trypanosomiasis in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Snijders, Rian; Fukinsia, Alain; Claeys, Yves; Mpanya, Alain; Hasker, Epco; Meheus, Filip; Miaka, Erick; Boelaert, Marleen.
Afiliación
  • Snijders R; Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Fukinsia A; Programme National de Lutte Contre la Trypanosomiase Humaine Africaine, Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of Congo.
  • Claeys Y; Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Mpanya A; Programme National de Lutte Contre la Trypanosomiase Humaine Africaine, Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of Congo.
  • Hasker E; Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Meheus F; Section of Cancer Surveillance, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
  • Miaka E; Programme National de Lutte Contre la Trypanosomiase Humaine Africaine, Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of Congo.
  • Boelaert M; Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 14(12): e0008832, 2020 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33315896
BACKGROUND: Human African trypanosomiases caused by the Trypanosoma brucei gambiense parasite is a lethal disease targeted for eradication. One of the main disease control strategies is active case-finding through outreach campaigns. In 2014, a new method for active screening was developed with mini, motorcycle-based, teams. This study compares the cost of two active case-finding approaches, namely the traditional mobile teams and mini mobile teams, in the two health districts of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. METHODS: The financial and economic costs of both approaches were estimated from a health care provider perspective. Cost and operational data were collected for 12 months for 1 traditional team and 3 mini teams. The cost per person screened and diagnosed was calculated and univariate sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify the main cost drivers. RESULTS: During the study period in total 264,630 people were screened, and 23 HAT cases detected. The cost per person screened was lower for a mini team than for a traditional team in the study setting (US$1.86 versus US$2.08). A comparable result was found in a scenario analysis, assuming both teams would operate in a similar setting, with the cost per person screened by a mini team 15% lower than the cost per person screened by a traditional team (1.86 $ vs 2.14$). The main explanations for this lower cost are that mini teams work with fewer human resources, cheaper means of transportation and do not perform the Capillary Tube Centrifugation test or card agglutination test dilutions. DISCUSSION: Active HAT screening with mini mobile teams has a lower cost and could be a cost-effective alternative for active case-finding. Further research is needed to determine if mini mobile teams have similar or better yields than traditional mobile teams in terms of detections and cases successfully treated.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tripanosomiasis Africana / Tamizaje Masivo / Atención a la Salud Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA TROPICAL Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Bélgica

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tripanosomiasis Africana / Tamizaje Masivo / Atención a la Salud Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA TROPICAL Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Bélgica