Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of the 5-domain Niemann-Pick type C Clinical Severity Scale.
Patterson, Marc C; Lloyd-Price, Lucy; Guldberg, Christina; Doll, Helen; Burbridge, Claire; Chladek, Michael; íDali, Christine; Mengel, Eugen; Symonds, Tara.
Afiliación
  • Patterson MC; Mayo Clinic Children's Center, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. patterson.marc@mayo.edu.
  • Lloyd-Price L; Clinical Outcomes Solutions, Folkestone, Kent, UK.
  • Guldberg C; Orphazyme A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Doll H; Clinical Outcomes Solutions, Folkestone, Kent, UK.
  • Burbridge C; Clinical Outcomes Solutions, Folkestone, Kent, UK.
  • Chladek M; Clinical Outcomes Solutions, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • íDali C; Orphazyme A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Mengel E; SphinCS GmbH, Institute of Clinical Science for LSD, Hochheim, Germany.
  • Symonds T; Clinical Outcomes Solutions, Folkestone, Kent, UK.
Orphanet J Rare Dis ; 16(1): 79, 2021 02 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33579322
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Niemann-Pick disease type C (NPC) is an ultra-rare, progressive, genetic disease leading to impaired lysosomal function and neurodegeneration causing serious morbidity and shortened life expectancy. The Niemann-Pick type C Clinical Severity Scale (NPCCSS) is a 17 domain, disease-specific, clinician-reported outcome measure of disease severity and progression. An abbreviated 5-domain NPCCSS scale has been developed (measuring Ambulation, Swallow, Cognition, Speech, and Fine Motor Skills) and the scale reliability has been established. Additional psychometric properties and meaningful change of the scale need, however, to be assessed.

METHODS:

Mixed method studies were conducted to ascertain which NPCCSS domains were most important, as well as to explore meaningful change 1) surveys in caregivers/patients (n = 49) and 2) interviews with clinicians (n = 5) as well as caregivers/patients (n = 28). Clinical trial data (n = 43) assessed construct validity and meaningful change through an anchor-based approach.

RESULTS:

Domains identified as most important by clinicians, caregivers, and patients (independent of current age, age of onset, and disease severity) were Ambulation, Swallow, Cognition, Speech, and Fine Motor Skills, indicating content validity of the 5-domain NPCCSS. Criterion validity was shown with the 5-domain NPCCSS being highly correlated with the 17-item NPCCSS total score (excluding hearing domains), r2 = 0.97. Convergent validity was demonstrated against the 9 Hole Peg Test, r2 = 0.65 (n = 31 patients), and the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA), r2 = 0.86 (n = 49 patients). Any change was seen as meaningful by patients/caregivers across domains. Meaningful change using trial data and interviews with NPC experts (n = 5) and patients/caregivers (n = 28) suggested that a 1-category change on a domain is equivalent to 1-point change or greater in the 5-domain NPCCSS total score.

CONCLUSIONS:

Qualitative and quantitative data support content and construct validity of the 5-domain NPCCSS score as a valid endpoint in NPC trials. A 1-category change on any domain is equivalent to 1-point change or greater in the 5 domain NPCCSS total score, representing a clinically meaningful transition and reflecting loss of complex function and increased disability. Trial registration NCT02612129. Registered 23 November 2015, https//clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02612129.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Personas con Discapacidad / Enfermedad de Niemann-Pick Tipo C Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Orphanet J Rare Dis Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Personas con Discapacidad / Enfermedad de Niemann-Pick Tipo C Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Orphanet J Rare Dis Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos