Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
PERSONAL DOSIMETRY USING MONTE-CARLO SIMULATIONS FOR OCCUPATIONAL DOSE MONITORING IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY: THE RESULTS OF A PROOF OF CONCEPT IN A CLINICAL SETTING.
Almén, A; Andersson, M; O'Connor, U; Abdelrahman, M; Camp, A; García, V; Duch, M A; Ginjaume, M; Vanhavere, F.
Afiliación
  • Almén A; Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Andersson M; Department of Radiation Protection, Swedish Radiation Safety Authority, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • O'Connor U; Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Abdelrahman M; Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Camp A; The Belgian Nuclear Research Center, Boeretang, Belgium.
  • García V; Institut de Tècniques Energètiques, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.
  • Duch MA; Institut de Tècniques Energètiques, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.
  • Ginjaume M; Institut de Tècniques Energètiques, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.
  • Vanhavere F; Institut de Tècniques Energètiques, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 195(3-4): 391-398, 2021 Oct 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33823548
Exposure levels to staff in interventional radiology (IR) may be significant and appropriate assessment of radiation doses is needed. Issues regarding measurements using physical dosemeters in the clinical environment still exist. The objective of this work was to explore the prerequisites for assessing staff radiation dose, based on simulations only. Personal dose equivalent, Hp(10), was assessed using simulations based on Monte Carlo methods. The position of the operator was defined using a 3D motion tracking system. X-ray system exposure parameters were extracted from the x-ray equipment. The methodology was investigated and the simulations compared to measurements during IR procedures. The results indicate that the differences between simulated and measured staff radiation doses, in terms of the personal dose equivalent quantity Hp(10), are in the order of 30-70 %. The results are promising but some issues remain to be solved, e.g. an automated tracking of movable parts such as the ceiling-mounted protection shield.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Monitoreo de Radiación / Exposición Profesional Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Radiat Prot Dosimetry Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Monitoreo de Radiación / Exposición Profesional Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Radiat Prot Dosimetry Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia