Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical site infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gao, Junru; Wang, Yunyun; Song, Jingyu; Li, Ze; Ren, Jianan; Wang, Peige.
Afiliación
  • Gao J; Department of Emergency Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
  • Wang Y; Department of Emergency Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
  • Song J; Department of Emergency Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
  • Li Z; Department of Emergency Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
  • Ren J; Department of Emergency Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
  • Wang P; Lab for Trauma and Surgical Infections, Department of Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
J Adv Nurs ; 77(10): 3980-3990, 2021 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33905552
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Negative pressure wound therapy is one of the most common treatments for infected wounds. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy with conventional treatment methods in the treatment of surgical site infection.

DESIGN:

This study is registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. DATA SOURCES The Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched.

METHODS:

The systematic review was searched by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses method. All trials reporting the use of negative pressure wound therapy for surgical site infection treatment were included regardless of surgery type. The primary outcome measure was wound healing. Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay, medical costs, adverse events, and reoperation rates. Results are presented with 95% confidence intervals and report estimates as odds ratios. Heterogeneity was determined through the I2 test, with I2  > 50% indicating substantial heterogeneity and p < .10 significance. The search was performed on 10 March 2020.

RESULTS:

We identified 13 eligible trial comparisons, of which 2 were randomized controlled trials and 11 cohort study. Negative pressure wound therapy in surgical site infection (SSI) patients significantly increased wound healing rate, accelerated wound healing time, increased daily wound healing area, reduced hospital stay, and reduced adverse events. However, negative pressure wound therapy was associated with increased medical costs.

CONCLUSION:

Negative pressure wound therapy may be more effective for the treatment of surgical site infection relative to conventional debridement, dressings and other treatments. However, further high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the most optimal application of negative pressure wound therapy. IMPACT Negative pressure wound therapy is the best treatment strategy for surgical site infection. This study can improve medical practitioners' awareness of negative pressure wound therapy for surgical site infection, promoting the development of relevant randomized controlled trials.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Adv Nurs Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Adv Nurs Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China