Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Induction versus no induction chemotherapy before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in oesophageal adenocarcinoma: a multicentre randomised phase II trial (NCCTG N0849 [Alliance]).
Yoon, Harry H; Ou, Fang-Shu; Soori, Gamini S; Shi, Qian; Wigle, Dennis A; Sticca, Robert P; Miller, Robert Clell; Leenstra, James L; Peller, Patrick J; Ginos, Brenda; Heying, Erica; Wu, Tsung-Teh; Drevyanko, Timothy F; Ko, Stephen; Mattar, Bassam Ibrahim; Nikcevich, Daniel A; Behrens, Robert J; Khalil, Maged F; Kim, George P; Alberts, Steven R.
Afiliación
  • Yoon HH; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: Yoon.Harry@mayo.edu.
  • Ou FS; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: Ou.Fang-Shu@mayo.edu.
  • Soori GS; Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium, Omaha, NE, USA. Electronic address: gsoori@nebraskacancer.com.
  • Shi Q; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: Shi.Qian2@mayo.edu.
  • Wigle DA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: Wigle.Dennis@mayo.edu.
  • Sticca RP; Sanford Clinic North-Fargo, Fargo, ND, USA. Electronic address: robert.sticca@med.und.edu.
  • Miller RC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: miller.robert@mayo.edu.
  • Leenstra JL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: Leenstra.James@mayo.edu.
  • Peller PJ; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: peller.patrick@mayo.edu.
  • Ginos B; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: Ginos.Brenda@mayo.edu.
  • Heying E; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: Heying.Erica@mayo.edu.
  • Wu TT; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: Wu.TsungTeh@mayo.edu.
  • Drevyanko TF; UnityPoint Health, Des Moines, IA, USA. Electronic address: timothy.drevyanko@unitypoint.org.
  • Ko S; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA. Electronic address: Ko.Stephen@mayo.edu.
  • Mattar BI; Cancer Center of Kansas - Wichita, Wichita, KS, USA. Electronic address: bmattar@msn.com.
  • Nikcevich DA; Duluth Community Clinical Oncology Program (COOP), Duluth, MN, USA. Electronic address: daniel.nikcevich@essentiahealth.org.
  • Behrens RJ; Iowa Wide Oncology Research Coalition, Des Moines, IA, USA. Electronic address: rbehrens@cancercenterofiowa.com.
  • Khalil MF; Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, PA, USA. Electronic address: Maged.Khalil@lvhn.org.
  • Kim GP; 21(st) Century Oncology of Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA. Electronic address: george.kim@21co.com.
  • Alberts SR; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: alberts.steven@mayo.edu.
Eur J Cancer ; 150: 214-223, 2021 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33934058
ABSTRACT

AIM:

report primary results from the first multicentre randomised trial evaluating induction chemotherapy prior to trimodality therapy in patients with oesophageal or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Notably, recent data from a single-institution randomised trial reported that induction chemotherapy prolonged overall survival (OS) in patients with well/moderately differentiated tumours.

METHODS:

In this phase 2 trial (28 centres in the U.S. NCI-sponsored North Central Cancer Treatment Group [Alliance]), trimodality-eligible patients (T3-4N0, TanyN+) were randomised to receive induction (docetaxel, oxaliplatin, capecitabine; Arm A) or no induction chemotherapy (Arm B) followed by oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil/radiation and subsequent surgery. The primary endpoint was the rate of pathologic complete response (pathCR). Secondary/exploratory endpoints were OS and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS:

Of 55 patients evaluable for the primary endpoint, the pathCR rate was 28.6% (8/28) in A versus 40.7% (11/27) in B (P = .34). Given interim results indicating futility, accrual was terminated, but patients were followed. After a median follow-up of 60.4 months, a longer median OS in Arm A versus B was unexpectedly observed (3-year rates 57.1% versus 41.7%, respectively) driven by longer DFS after margin-free surgery. In posthoc analysis, induction (versus no induction) chemotherapy was associated with significantly longer OS and DFS among patients with well/moderately differentiated tumours, but not among patients with poorly/undifferentiated tumours (Pinteraction = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS:

Adding induction chemotherapy prior to trimodality therapy did not improve the primary endpoint, pathCR. However, induction chemotherapy was associated with longer median OS, particularly among patients with well/moderately differentiated tumours. These findings may inform further development of curative-intent trials in this disease.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Adenocarcinoma / Esofagectomía / Terapia Neoadyuvante / Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante / Quimioterapia de Inducción Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Cancer Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Adenocarcinoma / Esofagectomía / Terapia Neoadyuvante / Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante / Quimioterapia de Inducción Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Cancer Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article