Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Core Outcome Set for Reporting Outcomes of Interventions for Velopharyngeal Dysfunction: Final Results of the COS-VPD Initiative.
de Blacam, Catherine; Baylis, Adriane L; Kirschner, Richard E; Smith, Susan; Sell, Debbie; Sie, Kathleen C Y; Harris, Helen E; Orr, David J A.
Afiliación
  • de Blacam C; 575349Department of Plastic Surgery, 11595Children's Health Ireland at Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Baylis AL; 8863Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Kirschner RE; Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2650Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Smith S; 12305The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Sell D; Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2650Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Sie KCY; 12305The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Harris HE; 162839Department of General Practice, 8863Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Orr DJA; Speech and Language Therapy, 4956Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J ; 59(4_suppl2): S84-S96, 2022 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34398725
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To date, the recording of outcomes of interventions for velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) has not been standardized. This makes a comparison of results between studies challenging. The aim of this study was to develop a core outcome set (COS) for reporting outcomes in studies examining the management of VPD.

DESIGN:

A two-round Delphi consensus process was used to develop the COS. PATIENTS,

PARTICIPANTS:

The expert Delphi panel comprised patients and caregivers of patients with VPD, surgeons and speech and language therapists specializing in cleft palate, and researchers with expertise in VPD.

INTERVENTIONS:

A long list of outcomes was derived from the published literature. In each round of a Delphi survey, participants were asked to score outcomes using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations scale of 1 to 9, with 1 to 3 labeled "not important," 4 to 6 labeled "important but not critical," and 7 to 9 labeled "critical." MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURE:

Consensus criteria were specified a priori. Outcomes with a rating of 75% or more of the panel rating 7 to 9 and 25% or fewer rating 1 to 3 were included in the COS.

RESULTS:

A total of 31 core outcomes were identified from the Delphi process. This list was condensed to combine topic areas to produce a final COS of 10 outcomes, including both processes of care and patient-reported outcomes that should be considered for reporting in future studies of VPD.

CONCLUSIONS:

Implementation of the COS-VPD will facilitate consistency of outcomes data collection and comparison of results across studies.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proyectos de Investigación / Cuidadores Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Cleft Palate Craniofac J Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Irlanda

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proyectos de Investigación / Cuidadores Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Cleft Palate Craniofac J Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Irlanda