Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Management of colorectal anastomotic leakage using endoscopic negative pressure therapy with or without protective ostomy: a retrospective study.
Sandra-Petrescu, Flavius; Tzatzarakis, Emmanouil; Kähler, Georg; Reissfelder, Christoph; Herrle, Florian.
Afiliación
  • Sandra-Petrescu F; Chirurgische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany. flavius.sandra-petrescu@umm.de.
  • Tzatzarakis E; Chirurgische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Kähler G; Interdisziplinäre Endoskopie, Chirurgische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Reissfelder C; Chirurgische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Herrle F; Chirurgische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 36(10): 2261-2269, 2021 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34455472
PURPOSE: Management of colorectal anastomotic leakage (AL) is patient-oriented and requires an interdisciplinary approach. We analyzed the management of AL according to its severity and presence of ostomy and proposed a therapy algorithm. METHODS: We identified all patients who underwent colorectal surgery and developed an AL in our clinic between 2012 and 2017. The management of AL was retrospectively analyzed according to the severity grade: asymptomatic (A), requesting interventional or antibiotic therapy (B), undergoing re-operation (C). The groups were compared according to the leakage characteristics, presence of ostomy, and patient clinical conditions. RESULTS: We identified 784 consecutive patients meeting the inclusion criteria. Of these, 10.8% experienced an AL (A = 18%, B = 48%, and C = 34%). The rate of successful ostomy closure was 100% (A), 68% (B), and 62% (C), respectively. Within group B, 91% of the patients were treated solely by endoscopic negative pressure therapy (ENPT), whereas 37% of the patients within group C required ENPT in addition to surgery. Seven cases within group B (17%) required no protective ostomy (nOB) during ENPT which was itself shorter and required less cycles in comparison to group B with ostomy (OB) (p = 0.017 and 0.111, respectively). Moreover, the leakage distance to anal verge was higher in the OB subgroup (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: ENPT for the treatment of colorectal AL is efficient in combination with operative revision or protective ostomy. In selected patients, it is feasible also in the absence of a protective ostomy.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estomía / Neoplasias Colorrectales Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Colorectal Dis Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estomía / Neoplasias Colorrectales Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Colorectal Dis Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania