Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Real world utilization of nurse-driven urinary catheter removal protocol in patients with epidural pain catheters.
Beeler, Cole; Dbeibo, Lana; Yeap, Yar Luan; Porter, Haley; Beeson, Terrie; Schmidt, C Max; House, Michael G; Glossenger, Audrey; Kelley, Kristen; Birdas, Thomas J.
Afiliación
  • Beeler C; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IND. Electronic address: cbeeler@iupui.edu.
  • Dbeibo L; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IND.
  • Yeap YL; Indiana University Department of Anesthesia, Indianapolis, IND.
  • Porter H; Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IND.
  • Beeson T; Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IND.
  • Schmidt CM; Indiana University, School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IND.
  • House MG; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IND.
  • Glossenger A; Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IND.
  • Kelley K; Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IND.
  • Birdas TJ; Medical Director for Quality and Patient Safety, IUH AAHC, Department of Surgery, IUMC.
Am J Infect Control ; 50(4): 396-399, 2022 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34551336
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Surgeons use indwelling bladder catheters (IBCs) to avoid urinary retention in patients with epidural analgesic catheters. Reduction of IBC-days is associated with improved catheter-associated urinary tract infection rates (CAUTI). This study investigates real world application of a Nurse-Driven Catheter Removal Protocol (NDCRP) to reduce IBC-days in this patient population.

METHODS:

Patients with epidural catheters and IBC were targeted for IBC removal on post-operative day 1 (POD1). Patients were followed for application of the NDCRP, catheterization need, IBC re-anchoring, and complications.

RESULTS:

One hundred and thirty-three patients had IBCs removed on POD1 (Protocol Group) and 50 patients did not (Non-Protocol Group). There was a reduction in IBC-days in the Protocol Group despite incomplete adherence to the NDCRP (1.55 days vs 4.64 days; P < .001). Ninety-three patients (70%) were able to spontaneously void after early IBC removal. Fourteen patients (11%) were able to spontaneously void after serial in-and-out catheterization (I/O). No significant difference in re-anchoring was found between the protocol and non-protocol groups (26 vs 4 patients; P = .09).

CONCLUSIONS:

Early removal of IBCs (POD1) in patients with epidural catheters with the assistance of an NDCRP is a safe and successful strategy to reduce IBC-days in the hospital.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infecciones Urinarias / Catéteres Urinarios Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Infect Control Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infecciones Urinarias / Catéteres Urinarios Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Infect Control Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article