Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dietary glycaemic index and glycaemic load in relation to risk of breast cancer.
Rigi, Somaye; Salari-Moghaddam, Asma; Benisi-Kohansal, Sanaz; Azadbakht, Leila; Esmaillzadeh, Ahmad.
Afiliación
  • Rigi S; Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran14155-6117, Iran.
  • Salari-Moghaddam A; Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran14155-6117, Iran.
  • Benisi-Kohansal S; Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran14155-6117, Iran.
  • Azadbakht L; Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran14155-6117, Iran.
  • Esmaillzadeh A; Diabetes Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Public Health Nutr ; 25(6): 1658-1666, 2022 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34551840
OBJECTIVE: Previous studies on the association between glycaemic index (GI) and glycaemic load (GL) in relation to breast cancer risk are contradictory. The aim of this study was to examine the association between dietary GI and GL and risk of breast cancer in Iranian women. DESIGN: Population-based case-control study. Dietary GI and GL were assessed using a validated Willett-format 106-item semi-quantitative FFQ. SETTING: Isfahan, Iran. PARTICIPANTS: Cases were 350 patients with newly diagnosed stage I-IV breast cancer, for whom the status of breast cancer was confirmed by physical examination and mammography. Controls were 700 age-matched apparently healthy individuals who were randomly selected from general population. RESULTS: After controlling for potential confounders, individuals in the highest tertile of dietary GI had 47 % higher odds of breast cancer than women in the lowest tertile (OR: 1·47; (95 % CI 1·02, 2·12)). Stratified analysis by menopausal status showed such association among postmenopausal women (OR: 1·51; (95 % CI 1·02, 2·23)). We found no significant association between dietary GL and odds of breast cancer either before (OR: 1·35; (95 % CI 0·99, 1·84)) or after adjustment for potential confounders (OR: 1·24; (95 % CI 0·86, 1·79)). In addition, stratified analysis by menopausal status revealed no significant association between dietary GL and odds of breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed a significant positive association between dietary GI and odds of breast cancer. However, we observed no significant association between dietary GL and odds of breast cancer.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Carga Glucémica Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Public Health Nutr Asunto de la revista: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO / SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Irán

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Carga Glucémica Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Public Health Nutr Asunto de la revista: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO / SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Irán