Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sedentary behaviors and gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review.
Li, Qianqian; Zhu, Yuan; Wang, Jingyuan; Zhang, Yan; Pan, Yueshuai; Gu, Ruting; Guo, Xiaojing; Wei, Lili.
Afiliación
  • Li Q; Department of Nursing, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
  • Zhu Y; School of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
  • Wang J; Department of Nursing, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
  • Zhang Y; Department of Nursing, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
  • Pan Y; Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
  • Gu R; Department of Nursing, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
  • Guo X; Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
  • Wei L; Department of Nursing, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 48(2): 285-299, 2022 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34750937
ABSTRACT

AIM:

Sedentary behaviors are activities that expend less energy than 1.5 metabolic equivalents, such as watching TV, sitting. We aim to systematically review the evidence to determine the association of sedentary behavior (SB) with the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus, and the associations of SB with health outcomes in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and women at high risk of gestational diabetes mellitus.

METHODS:

Two researchers independently performed a literature search using PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, the Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine Source, and the Sedentary Behavior Research Database for studies published up to January 27, 2021. Randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, and observational studies were screened and selected if SB was assessed in the context of gestational diabetes mellitus. Two reviewers extracted the relevant information and independently assessed the included studies for quality and bias.

RESULTS:

Eighteen studies were included, involving 60 804 patients, and the timeline of the original study included was from 2006 to 2021. Our review showed that SB before pregnancy was not associated with the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus, while SB during pregnancy was uncertain about the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. In addition, there were significant associations between SB time and metabolic outcomes. In addition, SB may cause some adverse maternal and fetal outcomes.

CONCLUSION:

SB is likely to be the intermediary variable between occurrence of GDM and adverse maternal and infant outcome, rather than a direct influencing factor. Limited by the quantity and quality of included studies, the above conclusions need to be verified by more high-quality studies.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Diabetes Gestacional Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans / Infant / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: J Obstet Gynaecol Res Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Diabetes Gestacional Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans / Infant / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: J Obstet Gynaecol Res Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China